[ShawTaylor]

"This article reports that rather than leave "wifey" #3 home for certain important events in the recent aftermath of Mr. Giuliani's remarriage, that Mr. Giuliani has chosen to absent himself from important events in the lives of his children, including his son's high school graduation."

That's another nonstarter you got there, pal.
Every good parent strives to be present on the important occasions for their children. But depending on how high profile, how high up and how busy the parent is, it's not always possible to be present on EVERY big occasion for your kid.
Plenty of top executives for example have been forced to miss important occasions in their child's life because of a crises at the company. Lots of doctors miss some important occasions for their kids because a new emergency came up, and they had to save someone's life.
There is no law that says a parent MUST be there every time for important occasions, even it means someone else losing their lives or example. You are clutching at straws, and so far it's not working. Rudy keep soaring in the polls.

[sitetest]

Dear ShawTaylor,

It's not a non-starter.

"Plenty of top executives for example have been forced to miss important occasions in their child's life because of a crises at the company."

But that's what's not reported in the article.

The article makes clear that Mr. Giuliani chose to absent himself because his kids don't like the latest "wife," and he chose to stand by his new "wife" rather than go to the events without her.

In my responses, I've been careful to qualify my comments by conditioning them on the accuracy of the article.

If the article is mostly inaccurate, then Mr. Giuliani should hold a press conference with the new "wife" and his son and daughter, and they can lay these tales to rest.

Otherwise, the article's statement that the problem was the lack of acceptance of the new "wife" stands unrefuted.


sitetest