Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
"Although almost half of marriages end in divorce, a good estimate of how many folks divorce is probably in the range of 25% - 30% of folk who marry at least once."

Got any figures to back that up?
When we talk of those that have been affected by divorce, including the children of divorced parents, the figures of those that live with divorce go even higher
But then that's not even the point.
The point being, divorce is is commonplace and so mainstream in America, that no one even gives it a second look. You can't have an electorate that has divorces going on all the time, be worried about a candidate because he's gotten a divorce.
You are still blowing smoke.
141 posted on 03/04/2007 11:02:14 AM PST by ShawTaylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: ShawTaylor

Dear ShawTaylor,

"Got any figures to back that up?"

Divorce statistics are notoriously difficult to do. Even calculating the basic "divorce rate" is tough.

I've seen this particular figure thrown about once or twice, but most folks who deal in divorce statistics never really deal with the phenomenon statistically - that previously-divorced folks are more likely to divorce again.

However, it doesn't take much more than a small application of common sense to figure out that some folks divorce more than once, thus the divorce rate for all MARRIAGES will be higher than the divorce rate for all married PERSONS.

In my own family - my siblings and my wife's siblings - the divorce rate is nearly 50%. Out of 11 distinct marriages among us, five ended in divorce.

However, of eight different siblings involved in these marriages, only two have ever been divorced, which is only 25%.

Mr. Giuliani, himself, is a prime example of the phenomenon.

"The point being, divorce is is commonplace and so mainstream in America, that no one even gives it a second look."

I agree with you, as far as that goes.

But folks care about the details.

Thus, Jane Wyman's leaving Ronald Reagan high and dry, and Mr. Reagan marrying Nancy Davis a few years later, and then remaining married to her until his death, produces little, if any moral twinges in the vast majority of folks.

But someone who dumps one wife after 14 years, and another wife after another dozen or so years, sleeping around and openly, notoriously, and publicly squiring around the "other women," and trying to shove one of the "other women" down the throats of the wife's children IN THEIR OWN HOME WHILE STILL MARRIED TO THEIR MOTHER is rather unseemly behavior that will disgust all but the most hardened of the amoral.


sitetest


163 posted on 03/04/2007 11:52:31 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson