Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter, You're No Sister Souljah
The Politico ^ | 3 March 2007 | Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 03/03/2007 8:01:55 PM PST by llevrok

Ann Coulter is not African-American, does not sing and never said “If black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people?” However, she is the closest the Republicans will get to Sister Souljah.

Coulter has made a career of interspersing insightful and cutting political criticism with outrageous and morally repugnant remarks. She attracted considerable attention with her crack about the group of 9/11 widows dubbed the “Jersey girls,” with a line in one of her books, “These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them. ... I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much.”

Then, there was her crack about Muslims at last year’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC): “I think our motto should be post-9-11, ‘rag head talks tough, rag head faces consequences.’” At CPAC on Thursday, in endorsing Republican presidential aspirant Mitt Romney, who needs more bad press like a hole in the head, she piped up with this one: “I was going to say something about John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot.’”

It's about time for a presidential contender, perhaps all of them in the spirit of Newt Gingrich’s crusade for improving public discourse, to say “enough.” Coulter’s never-ending stream of venom is not amusing, unhelpful to Republicans, and not in keeping with the ideals of a party that fancies itself as the proponent of a colorblind society and heir to Lincoln.

It is not “caving” into political correctness to distance and indeed condemn such remarks as unworthy of a political event like CPAC. To the contrary, it is altogether fitting that a group that ostensibly searches for the best in conservative ideas, rewards political courage and encourages intellectual debate, should be able to differentiate the amusing from the offensive, and the clever from the vile.

Conservatives take great glee in condemning ideological opponents who share stages with Al Sharpton or give a convention seat to Michael Moore. It would certainly boost their credibility to toss their own baggage out.

Would it be a stunt to call out Coulter, who obviously revels in the attention of provocative pronouncements? No. Excommunication is not being suggested, just a public rebuke. By clearly stating her comments are beyond the bounds of civil discourse and her presence not a welcome addition to a mature political party, the Republicans could do themselves a world of good. How often does a party have the opportunity to display some measure of dignity, restraint and self-reflection.?

So who will play the role of Bill Clinton to Coulter’s Sister Souljah? It would be a sad commentary on the GOP if the answer is “no one.”

Jennifer Rubin is a writer who lives in Virginia. Her columns appear in the Weekly Standard, the American Spectator, Human Events, abc.com and National Review Online.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; cpac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last
To: an amused spectator

They are rather like the French, yes.


41 posted on 03/03/2007 8:41:22 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (a.k.a. What a jackass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

I guess she would find something wrong with me, as I was amused.


42 posted on 03/03/2007 8:41:34 PM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
And that would have been more appropriate then using Edwards name.

There is no basis to call him a faggot. She did it for attention. Pure and simple. She out to stuff a sandwich in her mouth and shut up.
43 posted on 03/03/2007 8:42:06 PM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle; lonestar67
Imagine if Ann had used the name Ken Melhman instead of John Edwards. Or David Drier.

OK, one more time:

Coulter did NOT "call Edwards a faggot". You did, JRochelle. Since you didn't bother to listen to her actual remarks or read an accurate transcript, you filled in the blanks yourself in Ann's game of "Made You Think It!".

Congratulations.

44 posted on 03/03/2007 8:42:26 PM PST by an amused spectator (The 1st Minnesota Regt died fighting a culture which embraced slavery. Think about it, Ellison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; carlo3b; stanz; gakrak; massfreeper; hosepipe; Donald Rumsfeld Fan; ...
A conservative make a perceived controversial comment - other conservatives and Republicans are supposed to condemn those comments, which discourages conservatives and allow the Left to move the issues that much further to the left.

Why is it when Ann lands a solid left jab at the libs, so-called conservatives yell, "Ouch!"?

Let me know if you'd like to be added to the Ann Coulter ping list.

45 posted on 03/03/2007 8:43:37 PM PST by jellybean (FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT! Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Because what she said was PERFECT.


46 posted on 03/03/2007 8:43:44 PM PST by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

The RINOS have come out in force against Ann Coulter.


47 posted on 03/03/2007 8:44:17 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat
"And that makes it good how?"

I realize Ann's prisons and manor may cause the unics within our conservative ranks to sulk back into their shadows of cowardice. Confrontingly she has more testosterone than all of them will have put together. And from a woman no less.

There are times for the exchange of false pleasantries like is observed of English snobbery, these are not one of those times. The opposition is working directly on behalf of the enemy. They, be they stooges or not, seek to undermine all this country was founded upon, replacing it with a false definition of our country's institutions and founding, creating in it's place their socialist utopia.

They are the enemy. And when dealing with an enemy, if you don't get it that it's time for bear knuckles, you actually become an enabler just like Trent Lott et. al.

Ann's presence and tone serves to expose conservative girlymen along with serving the enemy up a well deserving B'slappin'.
48 posted on 03/03/2007 8:44:21 PM PST by PRO 1 (POX on posters who's political bent causes them to refuse to be confused by the FACTS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Geez. You think people are going to pay attention to nuances?

Not on this one. It was classless and she'll be lucky if she ever gets to speak there again.


49 posted on 03/03/2007 8:44:41 PM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

Reagan ridiculed liberals constantly. One of his charms, and oh so effective.


50 posted on 03/03/2007 8:45:12 PM PST by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Minn
I just can't get behind somebody tone-deaf enough to yell "faggot" from a public podium.

Wow. She "yelled faggot"? I guess we must have listened to two different recordings of the same event.

Curious.

51 posted on 03/03/2007 8:45:18 PM PST by an amused spectator (The 1st Minnesota Regt died fighting a culture which embraced slavery. Think about it, Ellison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman

Perfect! The point Ann was making, I believe. I doubt you will get a direct answer.


52 posted on 03/03/2007 8:45:20 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Forget it. He's too busy ridiculing her without basis to care.


53 posted on 03/03/2007 8:45:22 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (a.k.a. What a jackass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

As was I. The left has free reign to bash the President, religion, conservatives in general, and we sit back and say it's not nice. Sort of like tying the military's hands in Iraq, I think.


54 posted on 03/03/2007 8:45:53 PM PST by SouthTexas (It's race time again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
She out to stuff a sandwich in her mouth and shut up.

And you ought to take a course or four in "Listening and Reading for Comprehension".

Don't you think you ought? :-)

55 posted on 03/03/2007 8:46:47 PM PST by an amused spectator (The 1st Minnesota Regt died fighting a culture which embraced slavery. Think about it, Ellison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
"There is no basis to call him a faggot."

Why? Girly man would have been better? To infer he is gay should be a compliment to the left. They embrace it.

FR is on record for posting a zillion pics that depict Edwards as a Homo. Was that ok?

56 posted on 03/03/2007 8:46:50 PM PST by bluecollarman (awaiting tag line inspiration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I see I am in the minority.

And I am no RINO. I support Hunter and Thompson.

I don't for a minute think that Hunter would approve of such language in a speech.
I don't like when we get in the gutter.


57 posted on 03/03/2007 8:46:52 PM PST by JRochelle (Hunter/Thompson, or Thompson/Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: llevrok; All
Jennifer can get over it, too.

Man, oh man, did any of these people aspiring to be lovers of this country ever read Thomas Paine or Sam Adams??? Like they were milquetoasts.

Ann makes her remarks in the context of greater political debate and the bulk of her research is ignored. She makes a comedic line and gets tons of attention.

How about the left wing's great comedic heroes: George Carlin, Lenny Bruce, or Richard Pryor? These guys are lionized by the left and they routinely used insulting language--but because Ann is conservative, she's forbidden to use an occasional jab while trying to make a point??!

John Edwards is a big boy. He can take it, can't he? Or is it beyond the pale to rip a guy who cares more about how his hair and moles look than if he's putting too big a "carbon assprint" on the earth with his huge McMansion??

58 posted on 03/03/2007 8:47:11 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Forty four posts and no photo. What have we come to?

59 posted on 03/03/2007 8:47:13 PM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRO 1
prisons = presence
60 posted on 03/03/2007 8:47:26 PM PST by PRO 1 (POX on posters who's political bent causes them to refuse to be confused by the FACTS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson