Skip to comments.
Republican lawmaker withdraws support of child savings bill ($500 account for every baby born in CA)
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^
| 3/3/07
| AP
Posted on 03/03/2007 2:02:55 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
I guess the surgery to remove the boot from his butt was successful.
To: NormsRevenge
He is tired of people laughing at him.
2
posted on
03/03/2007 2:03:55 PM PST
by
steveo
(Is there anything else I can help you with today?)
To: steveo
I heard Tom McClintock last night saying that he had pulled his support for it.. I bet he got hammered email and call wise..
3
posted on
03/03/2007 2:04:53 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......)
To: NormsRevenge
Ha! Ha!
This is the problem with legislatures. All the laws were basically written long, long ago. They mainly exist now to come up with stupid ideas like this one.
4
posted on
03/03/2007 2:05:38 PM PST
by
JennysCool
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
To: NormsRevenge
Sen. Bob Dutton, R-Rancho Cucamonga, who had promoted the measure as a good investment, What a maroon.
5
posted on
03/03/2007 2:05:56 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: NormsRevenge
"he defended the savings account idea as a way for Republicans to help individuals become self-sufficient"
By giving them free money from other taxpayers?
6
posted on
03/03/2007 2:10:54 PM PST
by
flashbunny
(<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
To: NormsRevenge
A Republican suggested this crap??? What more can the GOP do to flip off the base?
7
posted on
03/03/2007 2:11:00 PM PST
by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: NormsRevenge
If families added $50 a month to the state's initial contribution, the savings account would grow to nearly $17,500 at 5 percent interest over 18 years. If families just put in $50 a month to zero state initial contribution it would grow to about $16,300 over 18 years. What does that $17,500 have to do with anything other than making it look like the state's $500 "investment" is going to grow to a huge number for each child (with a little handwaving to distract you from the $600/year the parents would have to save to get to that final amount)?
8
posted on
03/03/2007 2:15:35 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Samoans: The (low) wage slaves in the Pelosi-Starkist complex.)
To: flashbunny
By giving them free money from other taxpayers? Nothing says "Rugged Individualism" like a big government check.
9
posted on
03/03/2007 2:17:33 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Samoans: The (low) wage slaves in the Pelosi-Starkist complex.)
To: NormsRevenge
I was going to post a WTF. What was he thinking in the first place? Is whatever Arnold has, contagious?
10
posted on
03/03/2007 2:19:13 PM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(As for me, I will remain neutral...for the time being.)
To: pissant
No wonder the GOP is in trouble.
11
posted on
03/03/2007 2:20:07 PM PST
by
SIDENET
(Dem victory= Hillary sending scared GOPers into the arms of a Liberal candidate.)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
Is whatever Arnold has, contagious? Creeping Socialism? I sure hope it's not contagious.
12
posted on
03/03/2007 2:22:28 PM PST
by
SIDENET
(Dem victory= Hillary sending scared GOPers into the arms of a Liberal candidate.)
To: flashbunny
Sounds like New Jersey.
Let's give the taxpayers a tiny bit of their money back, only to take 10x more next year, because we're in the hole for 4 billion! (Running a State...according to Jon S. Corslime, D NJ)
13
posted on
03/03/2007 2:23:07 PM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(As for me, I will remain neutral...for the time being.)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
As I read this, he thinks it would be doable in more prosperous times,, it didn't take him long to rescind his support with the acknowledgment of the state continuing to run in deficit mode.
At least he didn't propose to float a bond to cover it like a certain someone else has for everything else, and will propose more. ;-)
14
posted on
03/03/2007 2:26:32 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......)
To: NormsRevenge
It's an election year. The entire State Assembly is up for reelection this year. Just in time for the dopey voter to receive their rebate checks in October. He raised the sales tax to reduce the deficit, only to give it away and double the debt. A real Wall St. whiz!
15
posted on
03/03/2007 2:36:07 PM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(As for me, I will remain neutral...for the time being.)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
I believe the election will be next year, 2008.
To: liege
I stand corrected. Still, it's the dopey voters and Gov. that tick me off.
17
posted on
03/03/2007 2:47:19 PM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(As for me, I will remain neutral...for the time being.)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
Agreed. I can only try to not be a dopey voter myself.
To: liege
Not if you stick to your principles and remember all handouts come with a price.
19
posted on
03/03/2007 3:03:34 PM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(As for me, I will remain neutral...for the time being.)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
I was talking with my wife a few minutes ago and we both thought it would be a good idea to raise the voting age back to 21, with the exception that if you're active military you can vote if you are under 21. Would that take an amendment appeal?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson