One thing I haven't seen from Gulliani Supporters is why we should put our faith in Gulliani to act in opposition to his own beliefs, when we could pick a candidate that actually believes in life and would therefore act in accordance to his own principles.
Are the other republican candidates soft on the war on terror?
Because Giuliani is the only one who can beat Hillary.
If anyone other than Rudy gets nominate, HILLARY WINS, because she will easiely defeat them.
So the bottom line is still: NOMINATE RUDY OR SAY "HEIL FUHRER HILLARY".
So WHICH DO YOU PREFER?
Ignoring reality doesn't make it go away.
What the Freepers forget this ain't the 80s and 90s any more where we can all pretend that everything is hunky dory...Reagan won the cold war...and all we have to be concerned about is the trilogy of "abortions, guns & gay marriage".
I don't know about the others...but personally I will pick and LIVE in a state that represents my values...I for one can not and will not ever expect a President to go in an over-ride Massachusetts laws. They are one of fifty states that have STATES RIGHTS.
Some sh%t belongs at the state level, and in my opinion it is guns, abortions and gay marriage...
As for electing the NEXT "Commander in Chef"...Rudy is leading the pack, *and McNasty, McCain doesn't have a chance for anything but a melt down.