That's a great false dilemma. I'll answer your false dilemma hypothetical if you'll answer mine.
Hypothetical to answer your hypothetical. Both sides losing to Hillary.
The solib republican splits the base. The MSM turns on him the moment he is nominated. Hillary wins. Republican party is split.
The socon republican wins the nomination, loses to hildebeast in a tough fight. Republicans are united against the hillary presidency.
Which candidate is best for the republican party?
We now return to the regularly scheduled programming of the sound of crickets coming from team Rudy.....
Ok, Al. I'm over here on this thread so you can answer my contentions about how Rudy splits the socon base.
To: Kevmo
Read this article in full from the Weekly Standard and you'll see why that 'split' is not happening, and will not happen, over Rudy.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/370rvrau.asp 205 posted on 03/03/2007 8:53:03 PM PST by Al Simmons (Rudy in full drag would be a tougher POTUS than all the other candidates of both parties combined!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Free republic polls represent the socon base of the GOP. They show rudy splitting the socon base.
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=172;results=1 http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=171;results=1 The republican party can afford a socon, it cannot afford a split base. Hunter is a socon, and Rudy gives us a split base... so which is better for the republican party? Duncan Hunter.