This is what Ann really said:
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Ann_Coulter_calls_John_Edwards_faggot/20070302-105935-6328r/
It turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I'm kind of at an impasse -- I can't really talk about Edwards," she said.
"Rehab" may have been a reference to "Grey's Anatomy" star Isaiah Washington's decision to go into rehab during a public relations firestorm after he called one of his co-stars a "faggot."
____________________________________________________________
That's what UPI and other Libnuts want people to believe. They twist the truth to support their agenda.
I realize there is a bigger point to this thread, but WTF is going on in journalism when in this one sentence they can label Coulter "right wing author" yet there was not a "left-leaning" "left-wing" "leftist" or "liberal" to describe Edwards? This is where we are losing the war of words.
I know what she said and I know what the reference was to, thank you very much.
It was hateful and stupid.
I can't believe anyone would defend her.
"That's what UPI and other Libnuts want people to believe. They twist the truth to support their agenda."
Thank you alice. That's what they do want. It's just another page in their playbook. The one thing I have noticed lately is they seem to be into the next chapter of pretending to be sort of on our side. Don't believe it for a moment. They want the control and power; and if they are elected "Welcome to the newest 3rd world country".
Coulter is being railroaded indeed. But if anyone on the right refers to anything relating to race or homosexuality they allow the media to take advantage of them by manipulating the middle. You better have some good cards if you start a war with them because they survive off soundbites. Reality is redefined.