I also remain quite skeptical.
Why would Hillary's senior thesis be locked away in the first place, and then, why would it be eased into public availability?
I suspect most strongly that some America-hating and subversive text may have been replaced or simply omitted.
I wonder if the archived original would stand up to forensic scrutiny.
If Wellesley were to refuse a request for a forensic analysis for authentication, or if the original turns up somehow "missing", I would not be surprized.
.
"some America-hating or subversive text may have been replaced out or simply omitted."
Times-Roman IBM Selectric superscript, anyone?
Hey, it almost worked for Dan Rather!