Hey! Stop that!
Posted on 03/02/2007 4:11:55 PM PST by be4everfree
Despite the fervent interest in the thesis, few realize that it is no longer kept under lock and key. As MSNBC.com found, it is available to anyone who visits the archive room of the prestigious women’s college outside Boston. With Clinton’s opponents in the 2008 presidential race looking for the next “Swift Boat” attack ad, and the senator herself trying to cast off her liberal image, Clinton's 92-page thesis is certain to be read and reread by opposition researchers and reporters visiting the campus. But can an academic paper from nearly 40 years ago really unlock the politics and character of any former student, much less the early Democratic front-runner for the White House? This is your chance to decide before the political spin machines get their hands on it. snip.. Just last month, an anonymous commentator lamented on the conservative Web site Free Republic, "She's a Marxist. Saul Alinsky's student. I sure wish we could unearth that sealed thesis of hers that she wrote at Wellesley."
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Sorry if this is a dupe...I did a search.
LOL! Yes, I am "anonymously" famous.
Good thing, huh? I'd hate to be audited or winde up dead in Ft. Marcy Park....lol.
I have to admit; Alinsky offers food for thought:
"Saul Alinsky's rules of power tactics, excerpted from his 1971 book "Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals"
1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
2. Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. Whenever possible go outside the experience of the enemy.
4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. Ridicule is man's most potent weapon.
6. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. Keep the pressure on.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
10. Maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
That Hillary Clinton is a Stalinist should come as no surprise to anyone. What we as the voting public do with that knowledge will be quite revealing, indeed.
We've been clamoring for this for a lonnnnnng time.
Great to see it more available. Thanks tons for your important part.
It's sort of flattering......lol. We really do need to see her thesis --- she's living it but people don't realize what a Maxist she truly is. I cannot begin to fathom her Commander in Chief.
You can see that some of the democrat's most annoying tactics come straight from Alinsky. They are annoying because they are disingenuous, they are drawn from the philosophy that the ends are everything and anything that facilitates advancement toward the goal is good.
Hillary can be beat like an omelet using nothing more than her nationalized health care debacle.
And this suddenly unsealed out-in-the-open `Hillary's college thesis' is the real McCoy, eh?
Genuine, unedited, and undoctored?
I remain skeptical.
Most people are proud of their doctoral dissertations & master's theses. What's Hillary's problem?
Chances are it's an assinine work of third grade level whining. Like all of them, she is fluff... self battered and mutilated mental fluff like all selfloathing liberals.
This is not Alynski's work, this is military guerrilla tactic fed by the Soviet Union through the like of Alynski.
Well, you should atleast put the "black bar" over your eyes on your picture from your homepage. You know how "safe" those make you. ;o)
And an "anonymous" congratulations are in order.
Bill Clinton would have never won if we had been able to read it.
Hey! Stop that!
What I take away from this is that Hillary is partial to charming, charismatic men.
Wow, we were charming and witty back in grade school. I didn't realize that. Wow.
"It's a moronic statement," said Hillary Rodham's thesis adviser, Alan Schechter responding to those who say that a college research paper can reveal a candidate's politics or character.
That depends. If the subject is a conservative candidate for a federal judgeship then anything is fair game -- it's good to see that Chris Lacivita on our side has and will do unto the Rats as they do unto conservative federal judge nominees.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.