Posted on 03/02/2007 6:22:22 AM PST by WBL 1952
Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a naturaland not a human- inducedcause.
Earth is currently experiencing rapid warming, which the vast majority of climate scientists says is due to humans pumping huge amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Mars, too, appears to be enjoying more mild and balmy temperatures.
In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...
Seriously.
Do you see the BOTTOM of the recent "red" lines - the lines that are high-lighted as IF they were filled in from 0 to the current temp increase of .3 degrees? On the REAL chart from NASA for troposphere temperatures (which is what this character has warped for his purposes) the red lines are the max-min points for each year. They are NOT filled in like he has done. They do NOT show a continuous rise since 1980.
They do NOT show a "0" point at 1980 - a LOW point in NASA's graph!
This graph from the warmer socialist is a LIE. Temperatures since the 1998 peak have been up and down, but have NOT increased since that period: they are steady, but cycling up AND DOWN around the same point they were 8 years ago.
Gore may get doctorate (Univ.Of Minnesota, and Liberalism, CRAZY GORE ALERT )
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1788124/posts
To the guy who invented the internet.
Yeah, it's kind of hard selling *global warming* when people are digging out from a blizzard in -20 degree weather.
thanks, bfl
GW bump
Gristmill ("How to talk to skeptic") got the graph shown from the Climate Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/
I haven't clicked on all their links, so I don't know where they got their data, and so can't agree or disagree on their having falsified the NASA data.
They do NOT show a "0" point at 1980 - a LOW point in NASA's graph!
What NASA graph?
I think CRU set the "0" point at 1939, not 1980:
Thanks AG.
It's not so much that "falsified" NASA data, more that they (deliberately) are presenting it from "zero" points and in a graph format that shows the wrong conclusion. So you see large red lines, but not the declines and drops.
You "see" a huge increase, but the actual increase is LESS THAN 1/2 of one degree. Make sense?
Bingo! Ali Gorat would agree.
Sun causes global warming. Who'd have thunk?
ping
I see short and tall red lines and blue lines, and thick and thin red and blue lines:
Declines and drops - do you mean the black trend line doesn't decline and dip where it should?
PTT
BTTT
That is too rich. I think Algore has lost the last brain cells he has with his global warming theory.
How this graph looks for the previous ten centuries?
George W. Bush owns the Hummer franchise on Mars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.