(Rudy) "...supports strict constructionist judges."
What track record of his supports that assertion?
After all, the Democrats SAY they support our troops--but not their MISSION.
Rudy says he supports strict constructionist judges. But support their MISSION? Not hardly. Furthermore, the mission of originalist judges is what's needed. We don't need anybody to CONSTRUCT anything.
The proper mission of SCOTUS judges is *not* to overturn Roe (although that would occur) or any other agenda. No, their mission is to set aside all Stare Decisis bilge that eclipses the not-living-but-viable Constitution and use original intent for all decisions.
Yes, eclipse as opposed to penumbra.
Rudy supports jurists in the mold of Scalia like the Democrats support our troops.
Code Pink gave money to terrorists and supports them. Democrats stand with Code Pink. No, I'm not saying Rudy stands for terrorism, we all know he did yeoman duty after 9/11.
But Rudy stands with NARAL, the lobby supporting womb-terrorism.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
“I've known (Rudy Giuliani) for 26 years and we've talked about this many times," Olson said. "He feels very strongly that people like Justice Scalia, Chief Justice Roberts, Sam Alito, Clarence Thomas, are the type of people that he would put on the court…I'm quite convinced that this is a genuine viewpoint that he has." – Ted Olson
Works for me. I trust Ted Olsen. Do you?