Now, if we have a judicial applicant, a judicial nominee, who can look at a sonogram of an unborn child and not see the value of human life, then from this person, if I should become President of the United States, he will not receive a judicial appointment. I tell you what you he will receive, he will get an appointment with an optometrist so he can get a pair of eye glasses.
Duncan Hunter, Jan 22, 2007.
PING
Exhibit "A" in the case against the NYT and liberalism.
WTF does this mean?! There's nothing "complicated" about their positions, Rudy has no objection to a woman murdering her unborn child, as far as he is concerned it's a woman's "right" to be on a gurney on her way to deliver her baby and change her mind and get a partial birth abortion instead. Romney now claims to oppose abortion, but nothing he's ever done leads me to believe him.
Its really not that complicated.
Its only complicated if you want both pro abortion and anti abortion people to agree with you simultaneously.
Or...if you sudddenly wish to reverse your opinion, and don't want people to think that you are suddenly reversing your opinion.
This is the key, because I guarantee you that EVERY abortionist in the country will have a list of judges who are more than happy to sign an execution order any time of the day or night.
"version on humanity.."
Hmmmm. Where have I heard that before? Wait! Don't tell me. Right on the tip of my tongue.
DH, the anti-obfuscation candidate.
Like a hot knife of clarity through the typical word tangles constructed by politicians and lawyers.