Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Rudy Awakening for the NRA
Third Way ^ | 2/8/07 | Matt Bennett

Posted on 02/27/2007 11:33:50 PM PST by NormsRevenge

A little-noticed oddity of the 2008 presidential election field is that the three leading candidates for the Republican nomination have, at one time or another, gone to war with the NRA and its allies on the gun issue.

After six years of thumb-twiddling boredom – the issue has been off the radar in elections and in Congress – the gun lobby must have been a bit shocked when they realized what they faced: John McCain, Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney, all once proud champions of sensible gun laws, are the odds-on favorites to carry the GOP banner.

Consider their histories:

McCain was the lead sponsor of federal legislation to close the gun show loophole. In 2000, he appeared in television ads in Colorado urging voters to pass a ballot initiative closing the loophole there.

Romney signed a state ban on assault weapons into law as Governor of Massachusetts. And as the Boston Globe has reported, he said during a debate in 2002 that he supported his state’s tough gun laws and vowed that he would not “chip away at them” because they “protect us and provide for our safety”

Giuliani aggressively went after illegal gun traffickers when he was mayor, and he filed a lawsuit against a bunch of major gun manufactures and dealers. He’s on record supporting tougher gun laws, including the assault weapons ban.

Now, the gun lobby is not subtle in responding to perceived threats. NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre gave a speech six months after 9-11 comparing our old organization, Americans for Gun Safety, to al Qaeda and our founder to Osama bin Laden. LaPierre concluded, not without some hyperbole, that we were “a far greater threat to your freedom than any foreign force”.

So it’s no surprise that the NRA responded to this problem with overwhelming firepower.

First, they attacked John McCain, slathering his caricature on their magazine covers and calling him “one of the premier flag-carriers for the enemies of the Second Amendment.” McCain buckled like he was gut-shot – he has stopped talking about guns (despite the fact that the gun show loophole remains open in most states), and he just brought on James Jay Baker, once the NRA’s lead man in Washington, as a strategist for his “kitchen cabinet.”

Then they took on Mitt Romney. After getting peppered with criticism for his gun positions, Romney, who does not own a gun, now calls himself a “proud” NRA member. He even toured a gun show with the NRA’s chief lobbyist Chris Cox, (the guy who took over for McCain’s kitchen-mate Baker).

Most recently, they trained their sights on Rudy Giuliani. In a press release this week, an NRA ally called the National Shooting Sports Federation warned: “Giuliani No Friend to Gun Owners.”

How Giuliani will respond is not yet clear – as the NSSF notes, there are conflicting signals out of his camp about where he stands today on guns.

But if Rudy Giuliani is anything, he’s tough. We hope that he treats these thugs the way he treated them back when he was cleaning up New York one turnstile-jumper at a time.

Our advice to Rudy: tell the NRA and its minions that you will not be cowed, and stick to your guns: you are a strong supporter of the rights of law-abiding citizens to own firearms. But rights come with responsibilities. And anyone who isn’t responsible about owning, selling, or using their guns should lose those rights.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: awakening; banglist; nra; rudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 next last
To: bluedressman
the fact that self professed gun experts draw no distinction between weapons of the 18th century

Are you familiar with the original intent of the 2nd Amendment? It has nothing to do with hunting.

241 posted on 03/22/2007 8:28:31 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bluedressman; dirtboy
if you think NYC is less safe now for some other reason, that is your opinion....but the fact is it is much safer than it used to be with unchecked gun traffic.

I suppose the fact that they more than doubled the size of the police department had nothing whatsoever to do with that.

242 posted on 03/22/2007 8:40:36 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: bluedressman; dirtboy; Dead Corpse
More to the point, Rudy's cheif interest as CIC will be gun control and weapons control in the Middle East not in Paducah.

And if we support gun control in Iraq, the whole business of us "fighting for the freedom of Iraqis" is BS.

243 posted on 03/22/2007 8:41:54 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
"to allow the free flow of combat assault rifles in a crime ridden city like New York City"

I believe "Combat assault rifles" such as the M-16, AK-47, Thompson submachine are already illegal in NYC and the rest of the USA unless you buy a special license, which is very expensive and entails a background check. These legal firearms are individually registered with the government. This has been the way it's done since the 1930's. So what are you talking about? What more do you think should be done?

I'd really like to know how you intend to make law breakers become law abider's by passing stricter laws. I don't intend this to be a sarcastic post, I really want to know your thoughts.


I have heard there are less than 500 concealed carry permits in NYC, so if restricting ownership is working so well by the application of onerous laws why in the world is NYC crime ridden?
244 posted on 03/22/2007 8:43:52 AM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
'll admit I am not "up" on what is legal and what is not. I need to do some reading... I am still against weapons like the AK-47. Every citizen has a right to have guns for protection or for hunting (or collecting).

Do you know why the founders included the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution? Fair warning, the answer might scare you.

245 posted on 03/22/2007 8:45:08 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
I just can't see the need for a "killing machine."

Killing machines are exactly what guns are!

246 posted on 03/22/2007 8:45:51 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
I don't see any LIBERALS here, but I sure see a few idiot's who try to label people because they disagree with their choice of candidate!

You're being labeled due to your gross ignorance of the 2nd Amendment, not your candidate.

247 posted on 03/22/2007 8:46:59 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I know you don't trust him. You have made that very evident and there is no way to convince you to so I don't worry about that.

Kyoto is a treaty which must be confirmed by the Senate. It has rejected said treaty by 99-0 or 99-1. I don't see Rudy resubmitting it come what may. This cannot be proven to your satisfaction no doubt.


248 posted on 03/22/2007 8:49:14 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Stay tuned. I'm sure the subject will come up in debates.


249 posted on 03/22/2007 8:50:55 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O; dirtboy
I notice you didn't try to trash Ted Olson. That's a big surprise!

Well, there's the whole defending a traitor in court thing...

250 posted on 03/22/2007 8:52:13 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit; Clemenza; dirtboy
"...the REAL meaning of the second amendment: to allow us to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government."

What crap. Militias were barely able to defend themselves against Indians much less a modern military. And there is no "well-regulated" militia today.

Honest question. Do you truly believe that your posts on the 2nd Amendment are likely to convince gun owners with reservations about Rudy to vote for him? I'm genuinely curious.

251 posted on 03/22/2007 8:56:21 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Since I am not a spokesman for Giuliani what do my opinions have to do with anything?

And there is certainly nothing false in my statement in any case.

Myths about the militias need to face the light of day. We won our independence because George Washington built a federal army along professional lines. He had nothing but problems with militia's which were notoriously unreliable and ineffective. This isn't a secret.

Western settlements continually clamored for more military aid from Washington against the Indians knowing full well the weakness of militias. This also is not a secret.

And you are not going to pretend that there is any militia today which is well regulated are you?

Militia's were important to the Founders as auxillaries necessary fot the security of a Free State not a force to war against one.


252 posted on 03/22/2007 9:32:49 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: pissant

That is fine let it.


253 posted on 03/22/2007 9:33:28 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
all once proud champions of sensible gun laws

"Sensible gun laws" = code talk for total prohibition for everyone except police, military, politicians and celebrities (The NYC way)

254 posted on 03/22/2007 9:36:05 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Since I am not a spokesman for Giuliani what do my opinions have to do with anything?

It seemed to me like you were supporting him in the primaries. If I were a casual gun-owner on the fence about whether or not to vote for Rudy, your posts would have convinced me not to. The Giuiani supporters would do much less damage if they simply admitted that Rudy is wrong on guns, and stressed his positives instead.

255 posted on 03/22/2007 9:41:57 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: bluedressman
aimed at a critical situation.

What critical situation was that? Individual gun ownership by honest citizens?

The number of gun point robberies, especially in the outer boroughs of NYC justified this action, and

Do you seriously think that robbers are following gun laws? Or could it be that he increased the police force from 23,000 to 55,000 MIGHT have had something to do with it.

I for one feel safe traveling through these areas where 15 years ago only would if you were crazy

Typical New Yorker thinks guns cause crime. Tell me do you think flies cause sh!t? I hold people like you in contempt, not so much for their views, but for their arrogance in not critically examinining those views in the light of reason.

Don't worry, Rudy is not going to Waco anyone.

Tell that to the people his JBTs arrested for violating the Dinkins semi-auto ban.

Bottom line if you don't know enough about Rudy, read his book Leadership.....

I' ll read his liberal POS book when I read Hillary's and Obama's and for the same reason.

256 posted on 03/22/2007 9:45:51 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th

"No real Republican would really vote for any of these three, would they?"

Real republicans probably would

I know of very few real conservatives who would.


257 posted on 03/22/2007 9:49:36 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

I will support Rudy in the General election but do not know whom I will vote for in the Illinois primary. That depends upon the specific situation at the time.

There is no way to convince you about him so don't pretend there is.


258 posted on 03/22/2007 9:49:50 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: bluedressman; spunkets
the 10mm large clip handgun with body armor peircing rounds was a big problem becuase they were killing police officers

Where do you get this horse sh!t? there have only been 745 NYC police killed in the line of duty in the last 100 years including a number of other agencies that were assimilated into the NYC police in the early 20th century and that includes 23 that were killed by the 9/11 terrorists. Armor piercing pistol rounds have NEVER been available to the general populace although they have been issues to police and FBI for decades. Any police officers killed by those would have been "friendly fire" casualties

259 posted on 03/22/2007 9:58:56 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
There is no way to convince you about him so don't pretend there is.

You're absolutely right about that. I was referring to less ideological gun owners.

260 posted on 03/22/2007 10:03:50 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson