Rudolph Giuliani? What Were We Talking About? [FreeRepublic Sourced In Article]

Renew America ^ | Feb. 27, 2007 | Selwyn Duke

[Liz]

One wonders why Rudy elected to have a "scheduling conflict," thus allowing him to duck out of the upcoming New Hampshire debate.

The Rudester's handlers dare not put their little lapdog in the spotlight just yet.

They are scared silly Rudolfo will out himself, and say something stupidly liberal, at the same time they are manipulating voters to make the lisping liberal turd look conservative.

Keep in mind that, to date, Rudy's been allowed to make only measured responses, responses carefully calibrated to to keep his poll numbers up.

Skipping a debate in this important primary state means his handlers believe Rudeinsky is not yet ready for primetime.

[jla]

The new tagline suits you.

[unspun]

In another few months, it will be:

Giulliani?

What were we thinking?

[unspun]

Get away from the death and sex issues and Giulliani is a died-in-the-wool statist.

[airborne]

But...but...but....Hillary!!!

[Liz]

Thanks----glad you liked it.

[Antoninus]

Previously posted, but a good retread.

The sooner we eject liberal Rudy from the race, the better. I reckon the pollsters will keep him in, though. Then, when he gets his @ss handed to him when the actual voting starts, the MSM will come on TV and say, "Wow, what a surprise this is. Totally unexpected!"

[Blackirish]

But, really, you'd be best off devoting your resources to any PGA Tour ambitions your son may be nursing. You miss left far too much to be a contender.

________________________________________________________


What the hell does that mean? The guy can't even wright.


If Selwyn Duke (whoever he is) really believes that Rudy has no chance why waste the time writing this article.

The whole thing smells like a bucket of hysterical anti-Rudy FLOPSWEAT!!!!!

[You Dirty Rats]

I've never witnessed a more laughable game of collective "Let's pretend" than the media's Giuliani coverage.

I have. I read Duke's last column stating that Michael Savage should enter the race. Selwyn called Savage the "darkest of horses" which means he rates Savage's chances of winning the nomination higher than Rudy's. What utter nonsense.

[GoldwaterChick]

Does this mean that the Democrats will vote for him? Even if the Conservatives don't?

[George W. Bush]

My hats off to you guys who have exposed so much truth here despite the howls of the Juliebots.

This is a great article, ties a lot of Rudi info together.

[George W. Bush]

Your comment was interesting about the fortunes of 9/11. Both Hitlery and Rudi are candidates of chance. Hitlery because of who she married, Rudi because some muzzies crashed a jet into some buildings in his town.

No way in hell that either would get elected president otherwise. Oh, and Hitlery wouldn't be a NY senator either if she wasn't Clinton's Wife.

[Kevmo]

Where is Free Republic sourced in the article?

[George W. Bush]

The writer had links in the article to threads here at FR. Hover over them (if you View->Status Bar is turned on) or just click them.

[Kevmo]

Thanks, the links didn't survive in my download.

[jdm]

Look at the hyperlinks in the article.