Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

West 'humiliating' Iran, says Hans Blix
YNet ^ | Feb. 26, 2007

Posted on 02/26/2007 3:17:58 PM PST by Alouette

Former UN weapons inspector slams US and Europe over 'humiliating neo-colonial' attitude to Iran. 'People have their own pride whether you like them or don't,' he adds, urging use of economic incentives for better diplomacy

Associated Press Published: 02.26.07, 23:29 / Israel News

Former chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said Monday the United States, Europe and the UN Security Council are ''humiliating'' Iran by demanding that it suspend uranium enrichment before any negotiations and then dictating its rewards.

He said the package of economic and political incentives put forward in June 2006 by the US and key European countries, which was later endorsed by the council, did not mention the key issue of security guarantees for Iran or adequately address the possibility of US diplomatic recognition if Tehran renounces enrichment.

''The first incentive, I think, is to sit down with them in a direct talk rather than saying to them 'you do this, thereafter we will sit down at a table and tell you what you get for it,''' Blix said. ''That's getting away from a humiliating neo-colonial attitude to a more normal (one).''

''People have their own pride whether you like them or don't,'' he told a media briefing ahead of a daylong conference on ''Weapons Threats and International Security'' organized by The Century Foundation, a Washington-based research institute on domestic and international challenges.

By contrast, Blix said the six-party negotiations on North Korea's nuclear program in Beijing have focused on negotiations and recently addressed the country's security concerns and issues of the country's status and diplomatic relations with the United States - ''regrettably far too late.

''It could have been done much earlier. Years have been lost and plutonium has been gained in (North) Korea,'' Blix said, noting the country's nuclear test in October.

More carrots needed

In the case of Iran, however, Blix said, the international community has taken a completely different approach to negotiations.

Initially, the Europeans put a lot of carrots on the table without much American support. Gradually, there was more US backing including support for Iran's entry into the World Trade Organization, for spare parts for US-made aircraft, and facilitating investment if it gives up enrichment, he said.

''But we haven't heard anything about offers concerning guarantees for security in case they will go along with a renunciation of enrichment, nor much regarding recognition,'' Blix said.

''It's the US that can deliver assurances about security, and the US that can deliver recognition or normalization of relations,'' he said.

Blix criticized the demand first by the Europeans, then the US, and now by the Security Council, that first Iran must suspend enrichment and then there will be talks where ''they will explain what the Iranians will be given.''

''This is in a way like telling a child, first you will behave and thereafter you will be given your rewards,'' Blix said. ''And this, I think, is humiliating. The Iranians have resisted all the time saying, no, we are willing to talk, we are willing to talk about the suspension of enrichment, but we are not for suspension before the talks.''

''I would be surprised if a poker player would toss away his trump card before he sits down at the table. Who does that?'' he asked.

'Military threats are very dangerous'

Blix said he wants Iran to suspend its enrichment program ''but this is poor diplomacy - a poor way to try to achieve it.''

Blix led the US inspectors who searched for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the US-led invasion in 2003. Prior to that he headed the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. He now heads the Stockholm-based Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, which is sponsored by the Swedish government.

The IAEA reported last week that Iran had ignored Security Council demands to suspend enrichment and instead had expanded its enrichment program. Iran maintains that its program is purely aimed at the development of nuclear energy, but the Europeans and American believe its real goal is to produce nuclear weapons.

Blix said the economic sanctions which the Security Council imposed are useful.

''I don't think military threats are useful,'' he said. ''They will scare a number of people in Iran, yes. But at the same time, I think they are also very dangerous. A spark could fly, and they are very dangerous.''

Blix said the West should put itself in Iran's shoes, facing 140,000 American troops in Iraq, bases in Pakistan and Afghanistan which are major US allies, and the US talking to another Iranian neighbor, Azerbaijan.

''It's not absurd that they might feel a little worried about their security and that security guarantees from the US - in the same manner as in North Korea - could be useful,'' he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blix; iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Curse you, Hans Brix!


1 posted on 02/26/2007 3:18:01 PM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; af_vet_rr; agrace; albyjimc2; Alexander Rubin; ...
FReepMail to be added or removed from this pro-Israel/Judaic/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

2 posted on 02/26/2007 3:18:36 PM PST by Alouette (Learned Mother of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

"You're breakin' my bahls, Hans Brix!"


3 posted on 02/26/2007 3:19:05 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
'People have their own pride whether you like them or don't,'

Doesn't seem to bother you much when slamming Americans.
4 posted on 02/26/2007 3:19:54 PM PST by Question Liberal Authority (If Not For George W Bush, Saddam Hussein Would Be In Charge Of Iraq Today AND He Would Have NUKES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

To call this guy a village idiot is a slap in the face to village idiots worldwide. No wonder Iraq was able to stockpile things right under these moron's noses.


5 posted on 02/26/2007 3:20:29 PM PST by stm (Believe 1% of what you hear in the drive-by media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

OH THE HUMANITY!!!


6 posted on 02/26/2007 3:20:41 PM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

I wonder if he's being blackmailed. It's common for one of these twits to criticize the US, but the UN or the EU.


7 posted on 02/26/2007 3:21:00 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Shut up Hans.


8 posted on 02/26/2007 3:21:02 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette; monkapotamus; All

Nice to see Saddam little b***h saying crap I worry about him I thought he got kill by Chia Pet


9 posted on 02/26/2007 3:21:11 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette; monkapotamus; All

Nice to see Saddam little b***h saying crap I worry about him I thought he got kill by Chia Pet


10 posted on 02/26/2007 3:21:18 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Blix is wrong again, of course. If there is any humiliation happening, Iran is doing it to themselves.


11 posted on 02/26/2007 3:21:23 PM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

That guy is still around?


12 posted on 02/26/2007 3:21:56 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
Actually we are trying to humiliate the Iranian government Hans. I bet a good portion of the people in Iran support what we are doing. What a pitiful fool Hans is.
13 posted on 02/26/2007 3:22:22 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
....A spark could fly, and they are very dangerous....''

Sparks my a$$, we're talking high order detonations with secondaries you surrender monkey slimeball.
14 posted on 02/26/2007 3:22:28 PM PST by stm (Believe 1% of what you hear in the drive-by media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Perfect.


15 posted on 02/26/2007 3:23:51 PM PST by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
He's actually criticizing that we are not offering Iran enough goodies NOT to build atom bombs to wipe us out with. How about we just don't tolerate it, and Iran gets zip for breaking the rules and threatening us?

And how about WE get "humiliated" and open a can of whoop ass on Iran?

16 posted on 02/26/2007 3:24:27 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Groan!
Not Blix again.
When is this idiot going to get a clue?
17 posted on 02/26/2007 3:24:36 PM PST by ShawTaylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Humiliation? It's nothing compared to how humiliated they are going to feel when their nuclear facilities and military complexes lie in ruins!


18 posted on 02/26/2007 3:24:47 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

You mean, like it would be "humiliating" to eat a choclate bar in front of you, Hans?

If you can't be responsible Hans, you can't have access to the chocolate


19 posted on 02/26/2007 3:25:26 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson