Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: L98Fiero; KC_Conspirator

He may be. I was getting that impression reading to his previous posts. And the name is a little suspect too. Trying too hard to indicate his credentials. Then again, he could be exactly what/who he claims to be. Or maybe not.

But, with that said, I wholeheartedly support a paper ballot from the electronic voting machines. I do not support it being a receipt that the voter takes with them.

Cast your votes on the e-voting machine. Confirm the vote. Print the ballot. Confirm the ballot. Drop the ballot in the ballot box, just like was done with punch cards. At the end of the day, count the paper ballots, and compare to the electronic tallies. Instant backup counts, and a quick indicator of any e-fraud, plus a paper trail for a more verifiable recount.


63 posted on 02/26/2007 11:43:52 AM PST by Tatze (I'm in a state of taglinelessness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Tatze

What I'd be or not is totally irrelevant to honest discussion (there aren't many of us Goldwater vote, or true conservatives, online).

The 'paper trail' doesn't work because it may not match the voters' intentions and it won't/can't be checked independently.

The electronics aren't sufficiently reliable and they're a waste of taxpayer money. They fail too often and when they fail they prevent voters from casting their votes as intended.


65 posted on 02/26/2007 11:53:10 AM PST by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Tatze
You wrote:

"Cast your votes on the e-voting machine. Confirm the vote. Print the ballot. Confirm the ballot. Drop the ballot in the ballot box, just like was done with punch cards. At the end of the day, count the paper ballots, and compare to the electronic tallies. Instant backup counts, and a quick indicator of any e-fraud, plus a paper trail for a more verifiable recount."

With the addition that nobody is forced to use the electronics, and everyone given the option of creating the ballots personally (it's faster, cheaper, and more efficient), and the final tallies are scrutinized hand counts of the tangible ballots, that would be best and I totally agree with what you wrote.

67 posted on 02/26/2007 11:57:49 AM PST by lifelong_republican (Real Americans: Real Ballots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Tatze

"But, with that said, I wholeheartedly support a paper ballot from the electronic voting machines. I do not support it being a receipt that the voter takes with them."

As do I. That's why I have a problem with these posts. The last 2 times I voted, I did so electronically and was shown, not given, a secure paper reciept of my vote after I chose "finish". And that's in Mississippi.

IMO, this is a non-issue being pushed by liberals and their election stealing ilk. The fact that this non-issue is this posters's ONLY issue, I have no doubt he's one of FR's many newer stealth trolls.


69 posted on 02/26/2007 12:05:26 PM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson