Is this your first username here or are you truly a first-day person giving advice on interpreting this kind of nonsense?
And I don't think giving reasonable caveats to what is clearly speculative 'science' is anything like jumping to conclusions. For my money, taking a few names which really were extremely common in Judaea any time between 300 BC and 100 AD, suggesting that because they occur together (as such names always would in a family tomb) they indicate one particular now-famous family and then even suggesting that there is credible DNA evidence in the case is the conclusion-jumping approach.
You wouldn't have had anything to do with making that 'film' would you?
Totally agree with you .
Read the book The Medici Conspiracy. You wont believe the amount of total frauds there are in the Middle east ( and Italian) antique business. This is REAL junk science . The story has 1000 hole sin it . Look at Camerons past projects,look at REAL scientist views of these boxes. he fails to give ANY details of the DNA evidence. What DNA evidence? I though the bones were lost? He'd still need DNAA from a Jesus decendant alive now for comparison . Complete nonsense here.