Like I had said in another thread, efforts to attack the Lord are becoming a regular Lenten staple.
There is nothing new about this.
It seems that every few years, someone somewhere manages to crawls out of obscurity, and proclaims that they have "irrefutable evidence" which proves Christ as a fraud.
I say the same thing every time this happens; "Could it be that the frightened disciples of Christ, who managed to find incredible bravery after his ascension, were martyred for the sake of something they knew was not true? How could they support a lie, if they were not fully convinced by what they personally witnessed?"
And what about the apostle Paul, who spent his earlier years as the great Pharisee persecutor of Christians. How is it that even he would dare walk away from such a high position within the Jewish faith, and put his life on the line for a lie? Those who study the bible, know that Paul was perhaps one of the single most intelligent men of his time, and there was nothing material to gain for any of these men. In light of all the so called evidence that can be provided by the naysayers, I tend to always revert back to the historical account of the Saints.
Also, I know in my spirit that Jesus is just who he claims to be, so let the naysayers rail on.
They prove nothing.