To: cougar_mccxxi
It sure tears apart the enemedias "story".
The big question in my mind is, why was it necessary to burn all of them alive? Just what did they have that made the govt/Klintoons want to murder American men women and children?
3 posted on
02/26/2007 7:41:52 AM PST by
rawcatslyentist
("The liberty we prize is not America’s gift to the world, it is God’s gift to humanity.”GWB-03)
To: rawcatslyentist
"The big question in my mind is, why was it necessary to burn all of them alive?" Janet Reno and Bill Clinton were making a statement.
5 posted on
02/26/2007 7:43:14 AM PST by
TommyDale
(What will Rudy do in the War on Terror? Implement gun control on insurgents and Al Qaeda?)
To: rawcatslyentist
The big question in my mind is, why was it necessary to burn all of them alive? Because they could.
10 posted on
02/26/2007 7:55:20 AM PST by
Oztrich Boy
( for those in Rio Linda, there's conservapedia)
To: rawcatslyentist
No modern government (free or dictator) will tolerate an organized and armed nongovernment paramilitary within their borders. Branch Davidians became a red flag when they owned 200 legal AR-15 rifles, and attempted to create a cohesive military unit. The government will tolerate 200 men, each owning one rifle or one collector with 200 different types of rifles, but never 200 men armed with one type of weapon, organized into a unified cohesive combat unit not under government jurisdiction. Sooner or later, the feds will find something to arrest them. They will send in provacateurs or act on any minute legal violation or complaint in order to initiate the seizure of all the firearms. All governments want internal security in one form or another. Allowing small militias that can potentially grow into large militias will be seen as a potential threat.
17 posted on
02/26/2007 8:06:43 AM PST by
Fee
To: rawcatslyentist
The hidden story here is that the only government law enforcemnt people killed at waco were all former clintoon bodyguards.
And all of them were killed by bullets none of the Davidians owned.
20 posted on
02/26/2007 8:09:31 AM PST by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: rawcatslyentist
when the federal government attacks civilians with tanks because they are in legal possesion of legally owned weapons, there is a big problem...
21 posted on
02/26/2007 8:10:15 AM PST by
joe fonebone
(Either grow a pair, or vacate your chair...)
To: rawcatslyentist
The story here in North Texas is that they tapped into the governments computers and downloaded a sizable amount of forbidden knowledge. Something else, we were in one of our normal dry spells the forecast was for wind warnings on the lakes, so for 3 days the APC's cut a very large firebreak around the compound. Now why would they do that?
31 posted on
02/26/2007 8:26:46 AM PST by
fella
(Respect does not equal fear unless your a tyrant.)
To: rawcatslyentist
Most of the bureaucrats that ran the Gorelick wall had to have a reason why they didnt pass on information. Waco was that reason.
44 posted on
02/26/2007 9:14:12 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* ?I love you guys?)
To: rawcatslyentist
Just what did they have that made the govt/Klintoons want to murder American men women and children?Bullet holes coming down through the roof at a high angle, would be my guess.
There was a great deal of physical evidence in that building which would have shown the place to be a crime scene, and I fully believe, the Feds to be the perpetrators.
Randy Weaver, Gordon Kahl, and Koresh (and doubtless, others) could have all been arrested alone, in town or elsewhere, and without gunplay had the desire been there to do so. Instead, the agencies involved opted for grandstand raid and strongarm tactics designed to intimidate, which backfired.
61 posted on
02/26/2007 10:21:19 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: rawcatslyentist
While Koresh was not clean, what the Janet Reno Feds did at Waco exposed a very dark side of the American federales.
I think Waco was a pivotal event for Timothy McVeigh. IOW, when the feds turn on the citizens, the citizens might turn on the feds.
Note: I am not T. McVeigh.
Regards
99 posted on
02/26/2007 2:45:16 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: rawcatslyentist
It impressed me at the time as a practice run.
111 posted on
02/26/2007 6:39:09 PM PST by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson