Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Corin Stormhands
The bottom line for me is that I don't think it's a relevant issue at the Presidential level.

It is when a president's DOJ uses RICO statutes to go after anti-abortion groups, or when a ban on a particular abortion procedure reaches his desk, or any other federal expansion or restriction of abortion "rights" or funding for same comes up. A lot of ground can be gained or lost in that area, depending on the inclination of the president.

155 posted on 02/26/2007 11:48:06 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: hellinahandcart

It's fine if that's the way you see it, and if that's the most important issue for you. But I don't base my decisions on that alone. Yes, I'd like to see it elimated, but not I don't believe it will be. I think more good is done working at the local/personal level.

As for my choice for President, there are other considerations 1) electability, 2) fiscal responsibility, 3) the war on terror. I think Rudy carries the day with those.

Do I agree with him on every issue? No of course not.


156 posted on 02/26/2007 11:58:36 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (RINO - Rudy Is Number One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson