He said he would advise her against it. Then, if she decided to go forward, he would pay for it. He did not say he would be "happy" about it.
Think about bearing false witness for a minute.
"Happy to" is commonly interchanged with "willing to".
Perhaps it was a poor choice of words.
He is still a hard core abortion supporter, and thinks that stabbing a baby in the head and sucking his brains out is perfectly acceptable, since he said he would not support a partial birth abortion ban. (And don't give me the old it was because there was no "life of the mother" clause mantra. That has been disproven.)