Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
My apology for claiming that you had not posted facts. I had not seen this post before posting that.

Assuming, as I do, that you are right as to marriage #2 being at St. Monica's, I stand corrected. Now a question may still exist as to whether her first marriage was annulled without which there should never have been a marriage at St. Monica's. That the marriage was contracted in a Catholic Church ceremony suggests that her first marriage must have been annulled.

Therefore, if there was no annulment of marriage #2, Rudy is indeed living openly and notoriously in mortal sin. There, I said it. Of course, it is also gruesome that Rudy and Hanover married on April 15. What an awful anniversary!

Whose annulment was in 1983 (Rudy, Hanover, both?) and, given that the Church does not report annulments publicly, how do you know? Has Rudy or Hanover made an annulment or annulments public?

455 posted on 02/27/2007 12:07:12 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

No offense intended, none taken. I appreciate your scruples.


456 posted on 02/27/2007 8:39:44 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson