I used the word "lame" in quotes, because the choice of words was yours. My post 120 was in response to your post #116.
He should address that record. You shouldn't give such a lame response.
You're busted again, idiot.
As documented, the crappy tone is yours.
All you've succeeded in documenting is that you can't follow your own comments on a thread.
Oh, I followed the comments just fine. I wasn't talking about defense spending. There was no indication that I was. Yet you imply that I was and you imply that I may want to cut defense spending like a liberal.
It's like if I said to you, "if you beat your wife, we know where you stand".
Do you think you deserve such a remark from me?
Anyway, I tell you what I'll do. I'll redo my answer.
You:I would hardly call advocating funding national defense adequately after eight years of "peace dividend" "liberal." If you do, we know where you stand.
I would hardly call supporting Earmarks, "no Child Left Behind", "The Highway Bill" and the massive "Prescription Drug Benefit Bill", conservative spending. If you do, we know where you stand.