Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man

Great, you and I totally agree that it is indefensible to denigrate CPAC for being insufficiently conservative. So go argue with those on this thread — and in your camp — who are denigrating CPAC for being insufficiently conservative.


383 posted on 02/25/2007 3:06:49 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: M. Thatcher
>>>>>Great, you and I totally agree that it is indefensible to denigrate CPAC for being insufficiently conservative.

I never said that, Iron Lady!

Again. Saying someone or something is "insufficiently conservative", is not denigrating rhetoric. Criticism is at the core of our 1st amendment free speech and political dissent.

391 posted on 02/25/2007 3:40:11 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

To: M. Thatcher
Great, you and I totally agree that it is indefensible to denigrate CPAC for being insufficiently conservative.

Why is it indefensible?

"Insufficiently conservative" was a fair description of CPAC 2004, in my opinion, and Rudy wasn't even a consideration.

438 posted on 02/26/2007 4:59:59 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson