Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc
The Governor did what he's supposed to do - he acted as the head of the Executive Branch. From what I've read, he could have just sent a note over to the DSHS. Instead, he made sure more people heard about the mandate and the opt out clause.

Oh yes the "opt out clause". Parents can "opt out". Of course there will be a list of all the parents who "opt out". I'm sure CPS will have it.

19 posted on 02/25/2007 6:49:59 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative
Oh yes the "opt out clause". Parents can "opt out". Of course there will be a list of all the parents who "opt out". I'm sure CPS will have it.

Then they can be easily charged with something like *child abuse*, *neglect*, or *endangering the welfare of a minor*. Lots of material there.

20 posted on 02/25/2007 7:44:53 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

The law forbids such a list of who opts out. There is a list of those who request the form.


However, how many knew this before? And did or did not the Governor' action increase the knowledge of the general public (and terrify the more totalitarian docs) about the opt out?


21 posted on 02/25/2007 8:42:41 AM PST by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson