Posted on 02/24/2007 11:03:48 AM PST by NormsRevenge
If he does sign these bills, at least it will get the issues out of the way for the next GOP presidential nominee.
---
That's kind of a hollow argument, jmo, and at a cost that may not be worth in it in the long run anway. It does nothing more than bring this nation a day closer to its judgment ,imo,... and folks wonder why the Muslamics 'love' us so.. ;-)
Sigh...
ping
I'd be very surprised if GWB vetoes either ENDA or hate crime legislation.
Oh this is great. Christians and crosses out of the country. But gay rights to the front of the board. I am so happy about this I could throw up .
This is clearly a liberal written piece.
""This is a major step in our struggle," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign. "I know there's a lot of despair on the other side.""
Queer-brained Solmonese, as usual, is telling only part of the story. Naturally, conservatives aren't happy with the Democratic takeover of Congress, but despair is too extreme of a word to define how we feel about it. The truth is there's a lot of 'despair' on the side of the fruitcakes. Gay marriage is all but a lost cause for the foreseeable future, thanks to strong voter endorsement of anti-gay marriage constitutional amendments.
""Does he want to use one of his first vetoes to deny basic job protection to people?" asked Dave Noble, public policy director for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force."
That argument in itself is a good reason to veto the legislation. Don't be surprised if the President does veto this trash. The backlash from conservatives, who still by and large support him, would be very strong if he doesn't. And who cares about Dick Cheney's perverted daughter.
And then the homosexual lobby wonders why regular people fights their agenda/lifestyle.
Reframe the debate from denial of rights to advocacy of special interests.
The states say no and so the activists will take the decisions away from the state just like they did abortion.
Unfortunately I think you assessement is correct. Outside of stem cell research and the WOT, Bush has been more than willing to cave.
"Unfortunately I think you assessement is correct. Outside of stem cell research and the WOT, Bush has been more than willing to cave."
It would seem that way, but when he was Governor of Texas, he opposed hate crimes legislation. Historically, he's been against this kind of stuff and numerous GOP governors have vetoed state-level equivalents to the ENDA. He may not give a strong reason for his veto, but I would predict he'll veto at least one of them.
is national security even on the table?
Is there any reason why?
Is it raining fire and brimstone yet? Better get your fireproof umbrellas out because a storm is rising.
Billy Jack
billyjacksblog.com
shameless self-promotion is so unattractive
Just what American business needs to better compete in the world economy, a new class of iundisciplinable employee.
^^ That should read "indisciplinable".
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.