Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

You keep trying to divert from the REAL issues: NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEM APPOINTED JUDGES.

THAT is what is at stake.

What do you think will happen to the country and conservatism if the next President is a Dem? He/she will stack the court with judges more liberal than Ruth Bater Ginsburg. Are you going to be proud of yourself that you HELPED that happen?


65 posted on 02/23/2007 7:45:20 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion; EternalVigilance
While he was the “Republican Mayor” of New York City he appointed more than 60 men and women to the Civil, Criminal, and Family Court benchs. In all of those judicial appointment only two were Republican.

All of his other judical appointments were either registered Liberals or registered Democrats. As the “Republican Mayor” he had appointment power over more than 70 full commissioners in more than 50 City agencies, yet at no time during his administration did REPUBLICANS account for more than 10% of those appointments.

He even appointed Chuck Schumers wife as the City’s Department of Transportation Commissioner.


________________________________________________________________
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9054.html

“And even as we grieve for those who lost their lives, and our hearts and prayers go out to the victims and their loved ones, we may be able to find some sort of meaning in this tragedy by using it as a catalyst to revive national gun control efforts.”
Rudolph Giuliani

81 posted on 02/23/2007 7:55:58 PM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion; EternalVigilance; narses

"He/she will stack the court with judges more liberal than Ruth Bater Ginsburg."





Host Alan Colmes:
"Now, Roe versus -- now, you are pro-choice. How important is it to you as a pro-choice Republican to have a pro-choice on the court as someone...





hannity/colmes
http://politikditto.blogspot.com/2007/02/rudy-giuliani-supported-ruth-ginsberg.html


"Giuliani:"That is not the critical factor. And what's important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court. And [John Roberts] fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category. I mean, she was -- she maybe came at it from a very different political background, very qualified lawyer, very smart person. Lots of Republicans supported her. I expect, and listening to Senator Nelson, I expect that John Roberts will get support from a lot of Democrats."


82 posted on 02/23/2007 7:56:38 PM PST by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
You keep trying to divert from the REAL issues: NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEM APPOINTED JUDGES.

Giuliani is a DISASTER on national security. He defied the law and Congress to keep his city as a sanctuary city for hundreds of thousands of ILLEGAL foreign nationals.

And, His first impulse for dealing with terror is to take guns away from law-abiding citizens. And THAT, maam or sir, whichever of you happens to be using that account today, is the ultimate attack on the security of American citizens and their families.

THAT is what is at stake.

You don't even know what's at stake. After all, you're a flack for uber-RINO Arnold Schwarzeneggar.

What do you think will happen to the country and conservatism if the next President is a Dem?

No worse than would happen with a Dem that happens to have an "R" fraudulently behind their name.

He/she will stack the court with judges more liberal than Ruth Bater Ginsburg.

Giuliani has already expressed his great admiration for Ruth Buzzie. You must have missed that.

Since you can't name me five out of a hundred Republicans, even Giuliani "Republicans", that Rudy picked as mayor, name me one conservative that has ever been picked by any liberal for any court.

Are you going to be proud of yourself that you HELPED that happen?

I'll do what my tagline says, and rest secure that I did what was right. If the country is destroyed, it will be by wolves-in-sheep's-clothing like you, not by me.

86 posted on 02/23/2007 7:57:42 PM PST by EternalVigilance (“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
He/she will stack the court with judges more liberal than Ruth Bater Ginsburg.

Rudy has said he will appoint Judges in the category of a John Roberts or a Sam Alito. It is interesting to see what other sitting SC Judge he considers in that category. He has stated...

"And what's important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court. And [John Roberts] fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category. I mean, she was -- she maybe came at it from a very different political background, very qualified lawyer, very smart person. Lots of Republicans supported her."
Rudy Giuliani ["Hannity & Colmes", Fox News Network, 7/20/05

So explain why you think his choices will be a Roberts and not a Ginsburg. Seems to me he could go either way...and given his political resume, a Ginsburg would more likely be his choice.

195 posted on 02/23/2007 9:02:47 PM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson