[Billy Jacks blog]

Maybe you should look up the word "Vote" in the dictionary before you accuse someone else of being from Mars. Unlike you, I will withhold judgment on your intellectual abilities and simply say that elections are not for the purpose of appointing a person who is is completely unrepresentative of your views simply because the opponent is even more unrepresentative of your views.

Your attitude is what caused the Democrats to have control of Congress for 50 years and why they have control again. Liberals don't vote for Moderates at the primary level. Consequently, they force their party to provide them with liberal candidates. But, Conservatives are too stupid to understand that principle. Instead of voting against every moderate or liberal in the primary, we will vote for whoever has the best chance of winning. Consequently, there is no pressure for the party to provide conservative candidates. Get a clue man. A true conservative will always vote for a conservative and no one else. If you compromise your conservative principles by voting for a person who is not a conservative, then you are completely weakening the cause of conservatism!

Billy Jack
billyjacksblog.com

[FairOpinion]

Elections are about WINNING

[Al Simmons]

Find me a "true conservative" who in 2008:

a. Doesn't have ties to Dubya;

b. Has anything close to Hitlary's name-recognition, and who

c. has anything close to das Hildabeast's $$$$$$-raising ability, and

I WILL support him.

But there isn't.

The only candidate that fits the above criteria is....RUDY.