Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Food for thought...

Ask yourself: "What judges will Hillary put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

1 posted on 02/23/2007 7:05:54 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: FairOpinion
Q: "What judges will Hillary put on the Supreme Court"?
A: "The same kind of judges that Rudy would."

"Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine."
-Rudy Giuliani


167 posted on 02/23/2007 8:43:49 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Not me.

Rudy or Hillary may very well win the presidency.

In both cases that would put a left wing gun grabbing abortion loving, gay friendly liberal in the whitehouse.

Come 2008, Ill cast my vote for a conservative.

I surely hope that a conservative wins the Republican nomination. If not, a conservative will still win my vote.


186 posted on 02/23/2007 8:59:15 PM PST by dman4384
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
"Rudy - The lesser of two evils!"
191 posted on 02/23/2007 9:01:49 PM PST by airborne (Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
A liberal Rudy can't be trusted to appoint good judges any more then a liberal Hilary can.
194 posted on 02/23/2007 9:02:26 PM PST by Marine Inspector (Shhh, I’m hunting RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Rudy's a liberal and I don't know if I could vote for someone who wasn't pro-life... let alone all the other positions he has that puts him outside the Republican mainstream. That being said, I appreciate his candor. He's very clear about his views and isn't evasive or shifty like Hillary. Hillary's a proven liar. So character matters in our next President. Its never too early to start thinking about what we want in our 44th President.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

255 posted on 02/23/2007 9:38:11 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion; jla; All
When I ask myself, who of all the candidates in both parties do I most trust to keep me and my children safe? The answer is instantaneous, deeper than the level any particular policy debate can go: Rudy Giuliani

Thinking Hard About Voting For Rudy Guiliani
The Bulletin ^ | Feb. 22, 2007 | Maggie Gallagher



the whole ball of wax. bump.

And because of this alone, Rudy will demolish clinton (if Geffen and Obama haven't already done so).

WHY THE GEFFEN IMBROGLIO SIGNALS CLINTON'S END
'HILLARY'S STRATEGY--NOBODY GETS TO CRITICIZE HER' -- CHRIS MATTHEWS

with a WARNING FOR DAVID GEFFEN

257 posted on 02/23/2007 9:38:56 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

"So I could have sworn, even a few months ago, that I'd never vote for Rudy Giuliani, in spite of my deep respect for his considerable achievements as mayor. So why would I even think of changing my mind? Two things: national security, and Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court appointments.

"Ask yourself: "What judges will Hillary put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years."

GRRRRR. Hillary-scaremongering. This is the most empty-headed fatuous argument you could POSSIBLY make. Rudy is not facing Hillary in the primary -he is facing Romney, McCain, Huckabee, Hunter, maybe Newt and others. ... and this comment ....

"I never voted for Rudy when I lived in New York City for one simple reason: abortion. I don't look for purity in politicians, just for some small pro-life reason to vote for a guy: Medicaid funding, parental notification, partial birth abortion. Throw me the slightest lifeline, otherwise I assume he just doesn't want the vote of people like me. Rudy never did. So I never gave him my vote. And of course it doesn't help now to recall the way Rudy treated his second wife, nor do I particularly want to imagine the third Mrs. Giuliani as Laura Bush's successor."

... THESE FACTS ALONE IS WORTH A GOOD DROP IN HIS POLL NUMBERS. We are rpeatedly told newt is 'unelectable' for his divorces, and yet Rudy has had worse in his personal life. He will lose pro-lifers, evangelicals, and he will lose the women vote.

We are supposed to forgive him on it because he is a social liberal. uh huh, that will surely keep the evangelical vote solid. (Most of whom know little about this stuff, and the media wont tell them until Rudy is locked down as the GOP candidate, and then the DNC dirt will fly.)

And it gets worse. ... HOW DO YO KNOW RUDY WONT NOMINATE A SOUTER?

Ask yourself: "What judges will Rudy put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

Ask yourself: "What judges will Hunter put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

Ask yourself: "What judges will Romney put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

Ask yourself: "What judges will McCain put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.


Ask yourself: "What judges will Newt put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

He's 'prochoice' and anti-gun and on many other issues not conservative. WE CANNOT TRUST RUDY ON THAT ISSUE. WE CAN TRUST OTHER CANDIDATES FAR MORE.

National security - what's so special about Rudy on national security, a man who has never held any federal office. So he dissed Arafat. He's also far more open borders pro-amnesty than other candidates. How helpful is that?

Everytime I read another 'conservative for Rudy' article, I get madder and madder at the fatuous and lame arguments.

They dont add up to anything but poor excuse for 'well, I'll overlook the obvious problems and maybe they will go away'. There is this bizarre and hidden desperation for some conservatives to abandon what they believe in. We will never have conservative govt if that path is taken. Geez, folks, it is simple math: Find a candidate you believe in who follows your vision of what ought to be and vote for him/her. To do anything other than that in the primary is to throw away your vote.


261 posted on 02/23/2007 9:41:19 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
In the first place, you should never vote for someone who does not represent your views simply because he/she can beat another candidate. A vote is an expression of approval and agreement, not a choice of the lesser of two evils.

In addition, if Republicans spend all of their time gearing up for Hillary, they will be caught with their pants down when Obama gets the nomination.

Billy Jack
billyjacksblog.com
265 posted on 02/23/2007 9:44:19 PM PST by Billy Jacks blog (billyjacksblog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

We have a year to think about it. A lot can happen in a year. In a day for that matter.


333 posted on 02/23/2007 10:48:49 PM PST by Brimack34 (Rino's need not apply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Thinking Hard About Voting For Rudy Guiliani

Ok, I just thought about it. No.
348 posted on 02/23/2007 11:54:45 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

I will gladly support Hunter in the primaries, and Rudy in the general election. I DO NOT WANT HILLARY AS PRESIDENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.


387 posted on 02/24/2007 4:05:33 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus: "A whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
It's hard to see a state that George Bush won in which Rudy Giuliani will not beat Hillary Clinton. And he will put a whole slew of new blue states into play: Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, to name just three. (The latest Quinnipiac poll shows Giuliani in a dead heat with Clinton in Connecticut.) Which puts people like me, who care very deeply about marriage and life issues, in the position of thinking hard about Rudy.

THIS is shear idiocy, period - end - stop.

It's people like this Maggie Gallagher who give cause to repeal the 19th Amendment. Some women are just to STOO-PID to vote!
396 posted on 02/24/2007 6:25:57 AM PST by Condor51 (Rudy makes John Kerry look like a 'Right Wing Extremist'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

As an upside, Rudy's nomination might finally destroy the GOP.


397 posted on 02/24/2007 7:12:12 AM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Ask yourself: "What judges will Hillary put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

Pretty bad if you need to use hitlery to sell rudy.

399 posted on 02/24/2007 7:49:45 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Ask yourself: "What judges will Hillary put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

This from a Freeper who helped pushed Schwarzenegger on us.

405 posted on 02/24/2007 8:32:34 AM PST by lowbridge ("Of course Americans should vote Democrat" -Jihad Jaara, senior member, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

The thing I've noticed about FReeper supporters of Rudy...the majority of them are women or seem to use feminine nicknames.

The other thing I've noticed...this is not the forum I entered in 2004. It's no longer a conservative platform. It's dominated by RINOs, East Coast RINOs who think they and their New York candidate know what's good for the rest of us. Who knew that FReepers supported abortion, gun control and homosexuality? I've seen every excuse for this man with all his liberal philosophies. It's sickening, and there's a long haul to go before it finally ends. By that time, you won't know the difference between FR and DU.


410 posted on 02/24/2007 8:49:40 AM PST by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

I've already thought this through. I could never vote for Rudy in the primary. He's far too socially liberal.


419 posted on 02/24/2007 11:30:15 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

More like drinking hard about voting For Rudy Guiliani


428 posted on 02/24/2007 3:53:42 PM PST by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

454 posted on 03/21/2007 11:28:42 AM PDT by Al Simmons (Rudy will beat Hitlary. The Toon's smear machine is working overtime. Are you helping them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson