Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thinking Hard About Voting For Rudy Guiliani
The Bulletin ^ | Feb. 22, 2007 | Maggie Gallagher

Posted on 02/23/2007 7:05:51 PM PST by FairOpinion

I've never voted for Rudy Giuliani in my life. But I'm thinking hard about it now.

In both cases, I surprise myself.

The rest of America may know Rudy as "America's Mayor" for his ceremonial performance post-9/11, but for New Yorkers who lived through the Dinkins years, Rudy Giuliani is more than a guy who stands tall when the skyscrapers fall. By the late '90s, people were beginning to say that New York City was ungovernable: Remember the court-driven interest group spending, the disorder, the bums taking over the parks and the playgrounds and the street corners, spiraling welfare costs, the crime, the small business disaster, the high taxes, rent control, the South Bronx? New York was a disaster area, a poster child for what liberalism hath wrought.

The glittering cosmopolitan New York City we now live in, the one seemingly every college student in America dreams about moving to, is largely Rudy's gift, forged in the face of intense, daily, nasty invective from those who at the time insisted that to demand order and civility in a large city was to be a fascist.

Even Rudy's 9/11 performance tends to be misdescribed. It was not that he "stood tall" or didn't emotionally collapse. George Bush came to New York City and made graceful speeches about how we will rebuild the hole in the ground that still remains. What stood out for us in that dark time was not that the mayor of New York insisted we would triumph over this adversity, but that he didn't try to spin us about how unimaginably bad this sort of adversity was. He didn't try to soft-pedal the uncertainty, the chaos, the suffering the city was going through, and that gave us the confidence to believe that reality, terrible as it was, could in fact be faced.

I never voted for Rudy when I lived in New York City for one simple reason: abortion. I don't look for purity in politicians, just for some small pro-life reason to vote for a guy: Medicaid funding, parental notification, partial birth abortion. Throw me the slightest lifeline, otherwise I assume he just doesn't want the vote of people like me. Rudy never did. So I never gave him my vote. And of course it doesn't help now to recall the way Rudy treated his second wife, nor do I particularly want to imagine the third Mrs. Giuliani as Laura Bush's successor.

So I could have sworn, even a few months ago, that I'd never vote for Rudy Giuliani, in spite of my deep respect for his considerable achievements as mayor. So why would I even think of changing my mind? Two things: national security, and Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court appointments.

When I ask myself, who of all the candidates in both parties do I most trust to keep me and my children safe? The answer is instantaneous, deeper than the level any particular policy debate can go: Rudy Giuliani. And when I look ahead on social issues like gay marriage, the greatest threat I see is that the Supreme Court with two or more appointments from Hillary Clinton, will decide that our Founding Fathers, in their wisdom, created a national constitutional right to whatever social liberals have decided is the latest civil rights battle. It's hard to see a state that George Bush won in which Rudy Giuliani will not beat Hillary Clinton. And he will put a whole slew of new blue states into play: Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, to name just three. (The latest Quinnipiac poll shows Giuliani in a dead heat with Clinton in Connecticut.) Which puts people like me, who care very deeply about marriage and life issues, in the position of thinking hard about Rudy.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortteamrudy; clinton; democratrudy; electionpresident; elections; fraudiani; giuliani; gungrabber; hillary; homosexualagenda; judges; judiciary; partysplitter; perverts; rudy; willtapdance4votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-454 next last
To: FairOpinion

"So I could have sworn, even a few months ago, that I'd never vote for Rudy Giuliani, in spite of my deep respect for his considerable achievements as mayor. So why would I even think of changing my mind? Two things: national security, and Hillary Clinton's Supreme Court appointments.

"Ask yourself: "What judges will Hillary put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years."

GRRRRR. Hillary-scaremongering. This is the most empty-headed fatuous argument you could POSSIBLY make. Rudy is not facing Hillary in the primary -he is facing Romney, McCain, Huckabee, Hunter, maybe Newt and others. ... and this comment ....

"I never voted for Rudy when I lived in New York City for one simple reason: abortion. I don't look for purity in politicians, just for some small pro-life reason to vote for a guy: Medicaid funding, parental notification, partial birth abortion. Throw me the slightest lifeline, otherwise I assume he just doesn't want the vote of people like me. Rudy never did. So I never gave him my vote. And of course it doesn't help now to recall the way Rudy treated his second wife, nor do I particularly want to imagine the third Mrs. Giuliani as Laura Bush's successor."

... THESE FACTS ALONE IS WORTH A GOOD DROP IN HIS POLL NUMBERS. We are rpeatedly told newt is 'unelectable' for his divorces, and yet Rudy has had worse in his personal life. He will lose pro-lifers, evangelicals, and he will lose the women vote.

We are supposed to forgive him on it because he is a social liberal. uh huh, that will surely keep the evangelical vote solid. (Most of whom know little about this stuff, and the media wont tell them until Rudy is locked down as the GOP candidate, and then the DNC dirt will fly.)

And it gets worse. ... HOW DO YO KNOW RUDY WONT NOMINATE A SOUTER?

Ask yourself: "What judges will Rudy put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

Ask yourself: "What judges will Hunter put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

Ask yourself: "What judges will Romney put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

Ask yourself: "What judges will McCain put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.


Ask yourself: "What judges will Newt put on the Supreme Court"? THAT is what will make a difference for the next 50 years.

He's 'prochoice' and anti-gun and on many other issues not conservative. WE CANNOT TRUST RUDY ON THAT ISSUE. WE CAN TRUST OTHER CANDIDATES FAR MORE.

National security - what's so special about Rudy on national security, a man who has never held any federal office. So he dissed Arafat. He's also far more open borders pro-amnesty than other candidates. How helpful is that?

Everytime I read another 'conservative for Rudy' article, I get madder and madder at the fatuous and lame arguments.

They dont add up to anything but poor excuse for 'well, I'll overlook the obvious problems and maybe they will go away'. There is this bizarre and hidden desperation for some conservatives to abandon what they believe in. We will never have conservative govt if that path is taken. Geez, folks, it is simple math: Find a candidate you believe in who follows your vision of what ought to be and vote for him/her. To do anything other than that in the primary is to throw away your vote.


261 posted on 02/23/2007 9:41:19 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Recommend you READ the article!!!!


262 posted on 02/23/2007 9:41:59 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: TakeChargeBob
Hillary epitomizes extreme corruption and extreme liberalism

While Rudy epitomizes medium corruption and medium liberalism.

Just say no to liberalism.

263 posted on 02/23/2007 9:42:17 PM PST by Marine Inspector (Shhh, I’m hunting RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"And election is NOT between some imaginary people vs. real ones, it's between TWO (READ AGAIN: TWO) candidates"

Wrong. There are multiple candidates in the primary.
The primary decision is to decide who the best Republican candidate should be. There are many factors, and when you weight them *all* in totality, Rudy does NOT in any way add up to the best choice for conservative Republicans:

http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2007/02/who-should-be-our-next-president.html


264 posted on 02/23/2007 9:44:01 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
In the first place, you should never vote for someone who does not represent your views simply because he/she can beat another candidate. A vote is an expression of approval and agreement, not a choice of the lesser of two evils.

In addition, if Republicans spend all of their time gearing up for Hillary, they will be caught with their pants down when Obama gets the nomination.

Billy Jack
billyjacksblog.com
265 posted on 02/23/2007 9:44:19 PM PST by Billy Jacks blog (billyjacksblog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

"Hillary-scaremongering."


Sure, that's what some said about the 2006 election: "Pelosi scaremongering" and look what the Dems are doing after barely a month in power. Just think what will Hillary do.


266 posted on 02/23/2007 9:44:45 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Billy Jacks blog

"A vote is an expression of approval and agreement, not a choice of the lesser of two evils."


You just betrayed yourself -- you just revealed that you are from Mars. Clearly you are clueless about what elections mean.


267 posted on 02/23/2007 9:46:24 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"Hillary is likewise, not automatically assured of the 'Rat nomination"

"So you wouldn't mind President Barack Hussein Obama ?"

You are making the wrong assumption that Rudy is the only candidate who could stop Obama from getting elected.
If I proved to you that Rudy is less electable than either Newt or Romney, would you change your mind and support one of those two?

In fact, Romney or Newt both would be perfect candidates against Obama. Newt would be a bad candidate vis a vis Hilary due to gender gap (but so would Rudy).


268 posted on 02/23/2007 9:46:46 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Its never too early to start thinking about what we want in our 44th President.

Some want a POTUS fun and libby ~
I need my Prez more rock-ribby

269 posted on 02/23/2007 9:46:46 PM PST by b9 ("America is great because America is good." ~ Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Rudy is going to get enough of the middle that he won't need the fringe.

Yeah right. 3/4's of the kind of people who post at FR being "the fringe."

270 posted on 02/23/2007 9:47:04 PM PST by EternalVigilance (“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

FIRST: you have to win.

LOSING candidates can't nominate anyone to anything.


271 posted on 02/23/2007 9:47:48 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: My GOP

"And what's important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court. And he fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category."

"Yes, Rudy said Ginsburg was very intelligent, very honest, and a very good lawyer. "

Pity. I'd like a candidate stand up and call her a dangerous traitor to the Constitution who deserves impeachment and removal.


272 posted on 02/23/2007 9:48:13 PM PST by WOSG (The 4-fold path to save America - Think right, act right, speak right, vote right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
He may even have coattails and help the Republicans regain control of Congress.

Right. And millions of asteroids may fall out of the sky, striking only Democrats dead and leaving everybody else unscathed!

/s

273 posted on 02/23/2007 9:49:33 PM PST by EternalVigilance (“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Newt has public negativity ratings of 64%!! Newt couldn't win regardless of which Democrat wins. Rudy has positive ratings in the mid 60s. In the latest poll he wins independents 64%-27%. Rudy is the only Republican up over all the Democratic frontrunners. All the others are down double digits.


274 posted on 02/23/2007 9:50:29 PM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are pragmatic and realistic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

"I'd like a candidate stand up and call her a dangerous traitor to the Constitution who deserves impeachment and removal."

That's the way to win over mainstream and middle America. A sure winner there. /s


275 posted on 02/23/2007 9:51:52 PM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are pragmatic and realistic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Yeah right. 3/4's of the kind of people who post at FR being "the fringe."



Let's see:

"Over 200,000 people have registered for posting privileges on Free Republic "

"624 FR members voted for Hunter"



276 posted on 02/23/2007 9:52:08 PM PST by FairOpinion (Tell Congress: Work for Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Their last "show of power" was in the 2006 election, when they helped the Dems take control of Congress.

I'm glad to see somebody shares my perspective on this. Sadly they don't seem to have learned their lesson yet.

277 posted on 02/23/2007 9:53:25 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Clearly you are clueless about what elections mean.

It's clear enough what elections mean when they are won by people like you: The empowerment of leftwingers like Schwarzeneggar and Giuliani.

278 posted on 02/23/2007 9:53:34 PM PST by EternalVigilance (“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Stop pretending a FR poll is scientific and accurately represents anything. I wasn't around here in 1999 and 2000 but from what I hear according to FR polls Keyes was going to be the nominee in 2000!! LOL


279 posted on 02/23/2007 9:54:28 PM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are pragmatic and realistic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

How many have voted for Giuliani?


280 posted on 02/23/2007 9:54:43 PM PST by EternalVigilance (“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-454 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson