There's nothing "odious" about that statement. The judge is absolutely right. This case is a no-brainer.
He bolsters his decision with a patchwork of statements from other court decisions - some going back over a decade - and declares that these past decions are "law" which much be enforced when making his own ruling on this case.
Well duh, that's how cases *always* get decided in this country. WTH? Who wrote this garbage?
Re: your post..........
I'm sorry to hear you feel that way.