[scripter]

You were responding to one of the comments I have made, in which I stated that I believe that it is partly genetic and partly environmental.

Yes, I was responding to one of your comments, that much is true. What isn't true and is obvious for all to see is that I wasn't responding to the comment you reference above. And all anybody has to do is read post 32 and the post to which I replied to see your obfuscation for what it is.

Your continued failure to reference specific flaws in anything I've posted is quite telling.

[LtdGovt]

Yes, I was responding to one of your comments, that much is true. What isn't true and is obvious for all to see is that I wasn't responding to the comment you reference above. And all anybody has to do is read post 32 and the post to which I replied to see your obfuscation for what it is.

There would be no reason to being about that matter, unless you were referring to what I have said. You had probably read my comment and decided to say something about it.

Your continued failure to reference specific flaws in anything I've posted is quite telling.

I believe imitation is an indication of weakness. As for the specific flaws, I have already pointed them out - your failure to respond to my points does not make them less real.