[Froufrou]

"It's probably genetics and environment."

That is the laziest, most half-baked retort I've ever read here.

Since you are so lazy, I googled "is there a gay gene" for you and the answer is NO. Here's the link, for your spare time.

http://www.narth.com/docs/istheregene.html

[scripter]

Thanks. That link (Is There a "Gay Gene"?) is an excellent summary.

The radicals pushing the homosexual agenda have been talking about this gay gene for a long time. Here's another great summary on the science surrounding the issue: Born or Bred? Science Does Not Support the Claim That Homosexuality is Genetic.

[thehumanlynx]

I haven't scrolled down yet, but my guess is that LtdGovt will either a)not click the link or b)will not believe it b/c NARTH speaks of therapy to help homosexuals recover from their dangerous lifestyle. ( I think he will have a big problem with that premise of NARTHs existence)

He will put it in the same category as the AFA article. (he discounted that one b/c he hates the "wal-mart hating AFA"). Its a bit of deflection to refocus the conversation.