[scripter]

you pointed to one, that you didnt like because it is published on an AFA page. Not giving it much of a chance in my opinion.

He called it propaganda. What he didn't comment on, and can't, is all the supporting documentation for the AFA articles here

The above is the old small caliber ammunition we have to support the AFA articles. I haven't bothered pulling out the big guns.

As a matter of curiousity, how much responsibility do you believe genes play in someones homosexuality?

He's on record as saying genes play a huge role.

In post 10 he said: It probably is a combination of genetics and environment.

In post 128 he said: Environment plays a huge role. But so do genes.

His statement in post 10 is correct. His statement about genes in post 128 is incorrect and not supported by science. Not even scientists who are homosexual support his position because they understand linkage and association.

[thehumanlynx]

ah, i see he has commented already. As I've said many times here and in my discussions in real life, I have no doubt that certain folks are more susceptible to the temptation into homosexual behaviour, just as some are weak against pornography or lying or alcohol or . . . Everyone has there struggles, BUT that does not excuse the action. The gay folks and the sympathizers desparately want to have an excuse for their actions, it will NOT come to pass.

They sexualize everything, hippy-esque if it feels good - do it nonsense.

I swear, I cannot believe that such a small segment of society that choose to engage in this activity warrant such special attention.

[thehumanlynx]

ps. I believe I will be contacting the Hunter campaign very soon. You gotta like a conservative that plainly spells out his conservative views and they are *gasp* actually CONSERVATIVE.