[thehumanlynx]

there is a great deal of science to support ID and, in turn, refute evolution.

as an aside, I read through all this thread and I see that you have many different discussions with many people where you ask for evidence. Yet, the claims you support (or deny, with regard to others support) are not supported in any way by evidence on your part.

The only comment that even resembles justification is the comment I am responding to.. No, fact. People who doubt the theory of evolution may be spiritual masters, but they're not in the know when it comes to science. To me this is more of a thinly veiled dig at scripter than it is proof of anything.

For someone who demands so many articles/peer reviewed journals for proof, it would seem that you would be the first to voluntarily provide such articles, and yet... nothing. Scripter provided a great many links which you refused to read or looked at and completely discounted as propaganda pieces.

I believe there is something about a pot and a kettle that applies here.

[thehumanlynx]

scratch that, it is not veiled at all.

[scripter]

What's interesting is he made the claim of showing his superior morals by refusing to make personal attacks. Ha!

And since I don't buy the theory of evolution, one of his attempts at changing the subject, he questions my judgment—a personal attack. He's not interested in learning anything because he already knows everything, or so he appears to write.

Pot.
Kettle.
Black.
Indeed.

[LtdGovt]

For someone who demands so many articles/peer reviewed journals for proof, it would seem that you would be the first to voluntarily provide such articles, and yet... nothing. Scripter provided a great many links which you refused to read or looked at and completely discounted as propaganda pieces.

I'll take a look at studies and articles when they're done in an objective manner, something I don't expect from organisations like the Wal-Mart hating AFA.