[scripter]

You've called the material I posted propaganda (post 42). You told dcnd9 you were not reading propaganda pieces (post 88) and now you're saying you've pointed out flaws in propaganda you haven't read. You are mixing obfuscation with inconsistency.

[LtdGovt]

You've called the material I posted propaganda (post 42). You told dcnd9 you were not reading propaganda pieces (post 88) and now you're saying you've pointed out flaws in propaganda you haven't read.

Wrong again. I've pointed out the flaws in your assertions, so much so that you didn't bother to defend them.

Perhaps he read over the thread again and realized he wasn't fooling anybody but himself.

A rather fanciful claim, but amusing nonetheless.

He demonstrated no credibility while he was and here and has now moved on to other threads.

Facts are stubborn things, my friend. You need to keep that in mind.

As you said, he's most likely a re-tread.

You're supposed to ping someone when you're talking about him, instead of talking behind his back in this immoral fashion.