[Judith Anne]

Sorry, won't wash.

There is an entire body of unfinished science about the human brain, human sexual orientation, behavior and maturational development. There is no comprehensive overview because the science is still in development. I have no agenda, only a nurse's background study on what is so far known.

Your statement that anyone who says sexual orientation can be impacted by religious beliefs is a fundie Christian and flat out wrong is risible on its face. All kinds of changes can occur even in the face of injury, illness, chemistry, electricity, etc. Sexual orientation is not immune from those influences--no behavior, no matter how habit driven, is.

If you read over this thread again, I think you will find, to your chagrin, that you were obvious all along. And that many thoughtful FReepers showed your positions for what they were: agenda driven. There is a level of sophistication here that you think yourself superior to, and again, you are obvious and laughable.

Your recent join date and posting behavior indicates you are a re-tread--that you've quit or been thrown out before, and are back under another nom de plume.

Good luck with that.

[scripter]

If you read over this thread again, I think you will find, to your chagrin, that you were obvious all along.

Perhaps he read over the thread again and realized he wasn't fooling anybody but himself. He demonstrated no credibility while he was and here and has now moved on to other threads.

As you said, he's most likely a re-tread.

[LtdGovt]

There is an entire body of unfinished science about the human brain, human sexual orientation, behavior and maturational development. There is no comprehensive overview because the science is still in development. I have no agenda, only a nurse's background study on what is so far known.

Well, go on. There is no need for a comprehensive overview. Just refer to the relevant articles in the medical, biological or scientific journals, and I'll look them up. Put up or tone down. As far as agendas go, you need not deny that you don't have an agenda. I'm not a person who makes foul and baseless allegations against other people.

Your statement that anyone who says sexual orientation can be impacted by religious beliefs is a fundie Christian and flat out wrong is risible on its face. All kinds of changes can occur even in the face of injury, illness, chemistry, electricity, etc. Sexual orientation is not immune from those influences--no behavior, no matter how habit driven, is.

I know that injury or illness, any experience that comes with shock, can have a great effect. But religion? Don't think so. But anyway, since you are going to supply me with the articles, I'm about to be proven wrong, so these comments will not matter that much.

If you read over this thread again, I think you will find, to your chagrin, that you were obvious all along. And that many thoughtful FReepers showed your positions for what they were: agenda driven. There is a level of sophistication here that you think yourself superior to, and again, you are obvious and laughable.

I had already conceded that I am part of an elaborate conspiracy to harm you. There is no need for you to reiterate that, since that has already been established. However, I'm curious as to how you would label a person who sees conspiracies and agendas where there are none. (That doesn't refer to you, since you are merely stating the facts.)

Your recent join date and posting behavior indicates you are a re-tread--that you've quit or been thrown out before, and are back under another nom de plume.

Well, you have to right to be wrong, and even to believe that another person would spend a month posting on this website, as to get the chance to convince you. If you really believed that, would you have responded thrice to my posts? I probably shouldn't have said that, because now I will be denied the articles in the medical journals, for the psychological response will be an attempt to 'prove' that you really do believe, what you say you believe.

Thus far, your comments have been rather shallow. Mere assertions. But the subject matter is really interesting. Therefore, I hope that you don't behave in a childish manner and you do supply me with the material I have requested.

[Albion Wilde]

Your recent join date and posting behavior indicates you are a re-tread--that you've quit or been thrown out before, and are back under another nom de plume.

Very astute. Sounds like the old blowhard "John Robertson" (banned).