Cheney won't take back Pelosi comment

AP ^ | 02/23/07

[italianquaker]

Just ask edwards, he remembers the slapdown VP Cheney gave him during there (ahem) debate

[Carolinamom]

#61....Dittos.

[tarheelswamprat]

I hope the President extends Cheney's remarks and rips her a new one, but he's too much of a gentleman for that.

And that passivity is a major reason why he's been reduced to the dire and desperate circumstances in which he finds himself. So sad, and so unnecessary...

[TexasCajun]

Nancy's just squealing like a stuck pig!

[Pirate21]

Love it!  Love it!  I love how Vice President Cheney talks straight, is eloquent and calm (yet clear and blunt) in the process, explains his rationale clearly, and stands behind his words.

[veracious]

Ahhhh, a man with a back-bone. A man who can do and say the difficult things required to solve difficult problems.

[CottShop]

Nor should Cheney take back his comments! About time someone called the rats-rats. I see there's also some flap abotu obama and billary- she's demanding he appologize for somethign said by someone else? Lol- No way should he appologize- Hillary is going to get quite nasty in the coming months, and she'll NEVER apologize for anything she says or what her staff may say.

The following link is a signature link and does not relate to this thread http://sacredscoop.com

[CottShop]

In fact- perhaps the Reps should be going overseas and telling it like it is to foreign countries- that the far left dems are spinelss maggots that haven't got any patriotism for our country and want to tear this great nation down from the inside out- Do to the dems what Kerry, Nelson, Carter do 5to the president! See how they like it- Call them traitors.

[Enchante]

"I didn't question her patriotism. I questioned her judgment."


Bingo!! Pelosi is merely following the tired 'Rat cliche of screaming "stop questioning my patriotism!" whenever anyone makes a serious point about judgment, accountability, and results in foreign policy. The Demagogues want to advocate defeat and surrender at every turn yet pretend that they should be entrusted with foreign policy for the USA and the free world.

[gogeo]

The difference between the Administration and the Congress is that W views al Qaeda as a threat that we need protection from.

The Congress views W as a greater threat than al Qaeda, and that we need protection from him.

[Grampa Dave]

You have nailed the mentally rars in congress and the MSM with your comments below:

The difference between the Administration and the Congress is that W views al Qaeda as a threat that we need protection from.

The Congress views W as a greater threat than al Qaeda, and that we need protection from him.

[decimon]

Look out Nancy, here come Dick!

'peloso' means 'furry.' 'Pelosi' should be same same.

[wastedyears]

That's about the gist of it.

[nfldgirl]

The resemblance is striking!

[eyedigress]

The "take it back" phrase is reminiscent of kindergarten, isn't it? Our tax dollars at work.

What you say is chilling...It's like the third grade in corporate America. Adulthood has left the building. :^(

[OBXWanderer]

Lynn Cheney has more ball$ than most politicians.

Talk about MY dream ticket.

Cheney/Cheney in 08

[Madeleine Ward]

("...saying she was going to call President Bush directly with her complaint."

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!)

Oh, man. Now we are getting a look at what being led by a woman is going to be like. No offense to my fellow females here, but you have to admit she's acting and sounding so much like a GIRL. What a drama queen.

[IrishMike]

Cheney/Cheney in 08
.
.
.
It would be a great 16 years,
8 years each as President.

[savedbygrace]

Here's my question for Speaker Pelosi:

If, when VP Cheney criticizes your Iraq plan, he is questioning your patriotism, but when YOU criticize the President's Iraq plan, how do you conclude that you are NOT questioning HIS patriotism?

And a follow-up: Why do you think it should be permissible for you to practice this obvious double standard?

[silver charm]

I agree with you completely.

Not only do they demand we actuate the Al-qada strategy, they want to do it in a manner that will cause the most bloodshed and death to our brave soldiers.

They want to cut down on the funding to provide the ammo, armor, and training as well as the personnel to prosecute this mission thereby cutting back the very means by which the soldiers defend themselves.

They realize that the casualties being suffered now are hurting us but not badly enough to cause enough of us to demand we surrender (the dems best case scenario) so they plan to ramp up the death count to achieve their agenda.

Sick sick sick treasonous b**tards.