Since you dislike GW so much why do you use his name as your moniker?
Not at all!
We are at war in Iraq and what he did helped the other side and discouraged our troops.
Secondly, all he did was political posturing. It was a non-binding resolution measured to make political points from the anti-war crowd and solicit money from the likes of George Soros. He already knew the resolution had no real effect on what was going on, so it was purely for show, and I'm glad he "showed' us early on.
Ron Paul now stands a snowball's chance as he has nearly equaled Kerry's remark about ending up in Iraq if you fail to get a good education.
I'm enjoying watching how long the "passengers on this Titanic" will keep up their spin and endless replays of resources produced by liberals. It appears they've already "sent in the clowns".
Sooner or later a person catches on to what's actually working and what is not. Knowing when to fold 'em saves a lot of time, energy, resources and, later, embarrassment.