[si tacuissem]

The article The Problem with Carbon 14 and other dating methods has to be scientific - it uses footnotes and stuff!

Granted, it's just three footnotes, but they show the wisdom of this remarkable essay. So, here they are, in their whole splendor and somewhat odd - but original - enumeration¹:

Carbon dating references:
1) From a video Lecture by Dr. Kent Hovind²
6) Antarctic Journal, Washington
10) "Dry bones and other fossils" by Dr. Gary Parker

---

¹: I can think of two reasons for this:

1. Space is left for more annotations to come - or
2. Even more embarrassing sources were eliminated

Call me a skeptic, but I tend to No. 2...
²: Link added by me :-)

[longshadow]

1) From a video Lecture by Dr. Kent Hovind

Gee; is that by any chance the same Kent Hovind who bought his degree from an unaccreditted diploma mill called "Patriot University" and who is currently cooling his heels in jail for Tax evasions convictions?

Just for reference, here's photo of the original campus of "Patriot U" -- Hovind's alma mater:

Yup; anybody who gets a doctorate from a school like that must be a leading expert on the science of Radiometric Dating techniques.....

< /sarcasm>

[Gumlegs]

Hey! That's Dr. Gary Parker, Ed.D., "Creation Biologist." He's been at AIG and ICR for years. Here's a link to his AIG bio.