[Coyoteman]

You havent brought up one point just one point at a time. you dont want to seem to debate it that way1 how come. pick one thing you think is a error in the site I gave just one for now and then will go from there and will see that way plain and clear whos holds water!

See the links I provided in post #516, above.

I see you are still afraid to address the questions I have asked you in numerous posts now.

For the lurkers, those links in post #516 will provide a significant amount of information on radiocarbon dating. However, apparently Wakeup doesn't believe in that data for religious reasons, and will accept the most flimsy and unscientific arguments against the radiocarbon method if they seem to support his beliefs.

[Wakeup Sleeper]

I have adressed all points you have brought up, you are just unwilling to accept it, bring up one point at a time, make a specific comment regarding science pointing to evolution, and you will be easily shown that it is not scientific fact. just one point at a time. you are unwilling to do this because it makes it very clear when it is done this way. And thats just what evolurtionist propagandists are about making things anything BUT clear and specififc.