Replies

No, an evolutionist would take the system apart, determine how the engine worked and chart it out and build a knowledge base on how the engine worked and figure out how to make it better.

A creationist would look and say "I know nothing about this! It must be a creation of the Devil!"

And proceed to stone it and destroy the perceived "evil"

No, an evolutionist would take the system apart, determine how the engine worked and chart it out and build a knowledge base on how the engine worked and figure out how to make it better.

I agree an evolutionist may take it apart but then would ask the advice of of 40 people with PhDs what makes it tick and everyone would have a different opinion and therefore it would never get put back together. However, there will be at least one who would look into the exhaust pipe believing he could observe the past and see how the engine was initially put together.

That is a statement of arrogance. To deny the fact that most of true science discoveries were made by men and women who believe in God as the creator (not intelligent design).

It was meant to belittle those who believe in God as the Creator, because you do not wish to believe yourself.

You also do not accept that Satan exists and is the father of all lies.

Creationist believe in true science, that is science of testable things.

Your religion of evolution has no testable parts that prove your belief, it is all faith based (adaptation and variation are not evolution). Mutations have been proved not to be a mechanism of evolution, natural selection has been proved not to be a mechanism. Chemical evolution has been proved wrong.

All the hypothesis's have been proved wrong, so they sit and wait as new hypothesis's are made up and then worship it at the local museum.

Darwin relied on the future to find evidence of his demented brainchild, and to the dismay of the future they can not find hard evidence. They can only make evidence appear to fit the theory, not make the theory validated by the evidence.