False (as usual).
This is one example of a "missing link" -- what scientists call a transitional. Note its position in the chart which follows (hint--in the upper center):
Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)
Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)
Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)
Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406 A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)
Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33
Source: http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/environment/eePages/eeDating/HumanEvol_info.html
Where did you get those drawings from the sunday comics, anyone can make something up! and then tell everyone this is how it supposed to be put together, but we know from the past that evolutionists have lied and errored consistantly in this area, those line of supposed bones are nothing but no evidence to the way they are displayed nor confirmed, in other words the picture youve shown is a no evidence made up hypothetical with no evidenceto support its claims.
actually ,fossil discoveries have been shattering the standard beliefs with monotonous regularity. Each in its day was hailed as "scientific proof" that human beings evolved from apelike animals, yet all the canidates once proposed as our evolutionary ancestors have been knocked off the list. this is understood by any credible science.