[Wakeup Sleeper]

The flood is mostly regarded as being around 4300-4500 BC dont care what other sites you put up there if it is looked at biblicaly and archeaologists and historians who have studied and scholars agree that the over all date is around 4300-4500 BC, there is always gonna be someone with some adhock to throw in there but the best evidence is and mostly regarded date is 4300 -4500 BC. And to add the evidence is overwhelming to a global flood.

[Coyoteman]

The flood is mostly regarded as being around 4300-4500 BC dont care what other sites you put up there if it is looked at biblicaly and archeaologists and historians who have studied and scholars agree that the over all date is around 4300-4500 BC, there is always gonna be someone with some adhock to throw in there but the best evidence is and mostly regarded date is 4300 -4500 BC. And to add the evidence is overwhelming to a global flood.

OK. Your overwhelming evidence convinced me.

You can have your imaginary flood at any time you want.

[dread78645]

... archeaologists and historians who have studied and scholars agree that the over all date is around 4300-4500 BC, there is always gonna be someone with some adhock to throw in there but the best evidence is and mostly regarded date is 4300 -4500 BC.

You're claiming the best date is 500 years to 300 years (4500-4300) before Adam ....

So when did Noah become Adam's G..grandfather ?

[si tacuissem]

The flood is mostly regarded as being around 4300-4500 BC dont care what other sites you put up there if it is looked at biblicaly and archeaologists and historians who have studied and scholars agree that the over all date is around 4300-4500 BC, there is always gonna be someone with some adhock to throw in there but the best evidence is and mostly regarded date is 4300 -4500 BC

Who are those who "mostly regard" the flood as being around 4300-4500 BC. The voices in your head? Or can you give some links?