[si tacuissem]

A had a look at your latest posts in this thread. You made quite a few astounding statements - without giving the slightest shred of evidence:

1. #307: First of all!!!!! 2300 years bc is not the date of the flood!
2. #307:It is known fact that mathmaticaly man could not have been on the earth for much more than the ascribed timeline of the bible, or populations would be far from what they are today, this is also known MATHMATICAL fact! It is 4500 years BC.
3. #305: Just like the guy who invented the MRI machine and they gave the gibberish award to his evolutionist aids instead of him who he was the inventor, but he is a Christian.
4. #294: Evolutionist are the untrustworthy ones they have been caught in countless frauds,
5. #289: Sodom and Gomorah is not a myth they have found the actual citys my friend and they are covered with a substance that the locals call Brimstone, this is absolute archeaological fact, like I said you need to catch up!
6. #274: : It is known through out the history of the world that those in societies who followed after the moral spoken of in the bible lived much healthier lifestyles and those who disregarded morals in time soon found catastrophy this is historical fact, many were destroyed suddenly and if you look at all known imoral places today they are sitting right in great catastrophical potential areas.

All this claims were made without giving a link to some reliable source. You use phrases like "it is known...". To whom is it known? Not to me!

A wise man said: Trust, but verify.

I've to say that I don't even trust your claims - and I doubt that they can be verified:

1. How do you calculate this date? Do you have evidence for a world-wide flood at said date?
2. Do you think of the exponential growth of the population? If you take such a simple model, the world can't be older than a couple of month - otherwise we should be drowned in fruit-flies.
3. Do you refer to John Mallard? I think you're thinking of Raymond V. Damadian. Could you share your insight in the decision making process of the Nobel committee? Or do you have to wait until 2053 - like the rest of us - when the Nobel archives for 2003 will be opened?
4. As coyoteman said: Name five!
5. So a volcano destroyed them! Do you have more details?
6. Natural disasters tend to harm the rightful and the wicked the same.

[Wakeup Sleeper]

You know I havent said any of these things, without any evidence to back them! If you need the evidence and you are honest you would look them up for yourself! but you dont you refuse, that says something about your wanting or lack of wanting to know the truth.

[Wakeup Sleeper]

It is understood that the flood was around 4,300-4,500 years BC whenyou look at the geneology to Noah, there recorded in the bible and also recorded 1,000s of years later in the new testement. It is commonly understood that the flood did not take place 2,300 years BC but was more like 4,300-4,500 BC. Not even gonna waste my time with that one.

Dr. Raymond V. Damadian was shunned and not accredited for his work. PERIOD! He even took out a paid ad explaning his injustice and letting the public know because he couldnt rely on the mainstream media, this is fact.

If a generation passes every 25 years then that would mean 4,000 generations in 100,000 years do the math! were talking ridiculous! also much more could be said havent got the space/time, look for yourself if you are truly looking for the truth!

The evidence to the finds of sodom and gomorah have been known, the five cities of the plains they are located near the dead sea, they have found zigurat stands ashen ruins in gomorah the cities are covered with ash and pellets that are called brimstone and are nearly sulfur the pellets found are 96 -98% pure sulfur and there is no geo thermal activity anywhere in the area and these pellets are burened on the out shell and imbedded in the area. They found building structures etc... the structures there are composed of calcium sulfate and calcium carbonate which are by products of sulfur and limestone burning. the evidence is remarkable, look it up! very interesting! They have pictures of the city structures and the pellets and ash and burnt sulfur and limestone. very remarkable. they even checked with archeologists around the world and nowhere has it ever been found a composite of such sulfur pellets as these.

skeletal reconstructuring has been found fraudilent among evolutionists, skelotal supposed finds and later found hoaxes by evolutionists, thats several examples there, the fraudulent drawings of embryos, Earnst Haeckeal, the countless propaganda lies about vestigial organs proposed to class rooms, that have been so many cant even list them. The very fact that ALL eveidence isnt shown is a hoax and fraudulent on the behalf of evolutionists. etc...etc...

Peopl lived healthier lives in the past it is a moral evidential fact. The prisons are fuller today, we are a culture of death, the country was less divided, integrity was held in higher regard Im mean it isnt even worth arguing it with you everyone with any common sense knows that the world was more moral in general, not saying there werent moments in time, but the results were evident, that were there is immorality there is danger, just go to any unethical place today and you will be at greater risk of some immoral action taken on you. well these evidences and consequences were at much lower statistics than they are today this is a commonsensical fact and known to any honest seeker. Look up the statistics and the articles. Any honest person would.

Natural disasters tend to harm the rightful and the wicked the same? Is that a factual statement or your oppinion. Im just saying look at disasterous places and look at there lifestyles it makes you wonder, thats all.