[Coyoteman]

...Scientists question natures fundemental laws. Micheal Murphy University of Cambridge, and the list goes on and on and on!

This article on Murphy's research does not support your claim that "Scientists question natures fundemental laws."

Murphy is trying for a possibly more accurate estimate of the fine structure constant. He is not doing anything which supports creation "science" nor which casts doubt on science or the scientific method. (Do you read the things you reference, or just take the word of the creation "science" websites?)

Take a look: Michael Murphy's Research.

[Wakeup Sleeper]

Doesnt make a bit of difference, it shows clearly that there is a questioning in once believed constants! And I can show you many, many more articles and evidential research. So catch up coyoteman. Peace!