[mylife]

Well gee, theres a surprise!

[Obie Wan]

Awwwwwwwwww come on. You think ole Kim Jong Il might be lying to us ???

[SevenofNine]

Tiger do you think Chia Pet pulling our leg again PROBABLY MOST LIKELY

[Always Right]

In the days right after North Korea signed an agreement that would supposedly require its nuclear disarmament, the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il, made clear that he has no intention of giving up those weapons.

At least he is honest about his dishonesty.

[edpc]

Kim Jong Il, made clear that he has no intention of giving up those weapons.

This is quite a milestone. This is the most forthcoming the NKs have ever been.......

[FreePaul]

They pulled a con job on a very willing Clinton administration and they've done the same with a desperate Bush administration.

[Bitter Bierce]

In the days right after North Korea signed an agreement that would supposedly require its nuclear disarmament, the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il, made clear that he has no intention of giving up those weapons.

The consequences of that stance are likely to be far reaching. Politically, Presidents George W. Bush of the US and Roh Moo Hyun of South Korea, both having labeled the agreement a step toward getting North Korea to abandon its nuclear arms, will most likely be shown to have been naive or, worse, deceptive.

Riiiiight. So it's Bush's fault that he tried to take Kim Jong Il at his word rather than dismissing him at the outset as a lying megalomaniac lunatic POS? Ah, the joys of "diplomacy."

[bmwcyle]

Not as long as Iran is funding them under the table.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Bolton was right, just like Sen Helms was right when he criticized Bush for trusting Putin.

[Pistolshot]

WHERE'S CAPTAIN OBVIOUS WHEN YOU NEED HIM!!!

[TBP]

But they gave COndi their word. Surely that nice little Kim fellow wouldn't lie to Miss Condi, would he?