Your right to disbelieve.
But I would suggest you consider the sickness of the left.
The idea of risk bodily harm to themselves to hurt the U.S. is NOT a domain solely belonging to terrorists. Ask the "peace protestors" that act as human shields. Ask the "soldier" that tried to kill members of his own unit awhile back. Turns out he was Muslim...
Things like this don't just "happen". They didn't all find each other accidentally. They didn't independently concoct this campaign and find theselves miraculously on the show that tried to peddle forged documents about Bush. It's a setup planned long in advance by the DNC.
If you do not believe some of these people were approached before joining, fine. I don't have hard proof of that just strong suspicion. Just as I strongly suspect people that serve 6-9 months that wind up in dozens serving as congressional candidates for the DNC right upon their return. But I draw the line at the speech about them having the right to say as they wish as if they are acting independently. They are not. I've seen this playyed out too many times to be so naive.
This is not new, it's just kerry Act two.
As for whacked out soldiers? They've always been there. We had a guy burn a cross on the mess decks. One drove a forklift off the flight deck, and another took an on purpose dive either off the flight deck or Hanger Deck into the channel coming back from a cruise. Get a hundred thousand troops in one place and yea several are going to whack out.
There are Dems in the military. One guy I knew who had just started his second enlistment voted Carter because he was afraid Reagan was going to get us in a war.
I doubt the protesters are acting independently either. Their opinions as related to the war should have stopped after sending a letter to their congressman. Then again I can think of a few not too distant circumstances where a letter writing campaign to some congress critters by some service people would have been their military duty. The KITTY HAWK and KENNEDY issues come to mind.
The DNC could be behind the protest yea that's a good possibility. But enlisting persons solely for that purpose is far fetched. For one thing what would motivate them? Spies usually do it for the money. Look in almost any unit or command and you will find someone who doesn't want to be there even in peace time. A real good reason for lowering the obligated service time at least for the first enlistment. Four years active duty is enough to ask of any citizen then let them make a more experienced decision from there as to their military career. Some exceptions apply such as enlistments involving extended training.