Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
Why don't you get off your high moral horse?

Why should I? You have a patent on that kind of behavior?

Your need to demonize the people who disagree with you on this issue says a lot about you. What Elsie and I are saying is that a small child should not have his limbs ripped off for somebody else's crime. That's the result of what you're advocating, period.

Elsie said something that was different. He said that an abortion is permissible, only if the rapist is caught, tried and convicted. In my opinion, that is evil. Only a small fraction of the total number of rapes reach that stage, unfortunately, and if you recognize the fact that rape victims need to have access to abortions, then you need to cover them all.

Of course, we all prefer that they take morning-after-pills. But it isn't always possible. I don't think you or I can understand how traumatic such an event is.
449 posted on 02/23/2007 8:49:01 AM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]


To: LtdGovt; Elsie
Why should I? You have a patent on that kind of behavior?

If opposing the dismemberment of small children means I'm on a high moral horse, just call me Silverback the Singing Cowboy.

Elsie said something that was different. He said that an abortion is permissible, only if the rapist is caught, tried and convicted. In my opinion, that is evil. Only a small fraction of the total number of rapes reach that stage, unfortunately, and if you recognize the fact that rape victims need to have access to abortions, then you need to cover them all.

I'm pinging Elsie to this post, because I am certain that's not what he meant. Many pro-lifers believe that we should allow a rape and incest loophole so we can reduce the number of abortions, but only if there's a police report. I'm pretty sure that's what he meant.

But it isn't always possible. I don't think you or I can understand how traumatic such an event is.

I'm pretty sure you don't know what it's like to have your arm ripped off, but you're willing to visit it on another person because of the way they were conceived.

What other traumatic experiences are you willing to justify killing with? If a woman is raped by a family member, can she kill all the male family members who resemble him? How about if she's raped at work, and a coworker comes to rescue her--can she kill him because he reminds her of the event? Would it be OK if she just had him fired? If a husband cheats on a wife, can she kill the other woman so she doesn't have to worry about running into her at the grocery store? Can she kill the husband because he reminds her of this traumatic experience? If the wife cheats and she gets pregnant with the other man's child, can the husband whack the child so he's not reminded of this horrible betrayal?

There are a lot of bad experiences I've never had. I can't think of one that a small child should die for.

456 posted on 02/23/2007 9:02:09 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson