[dirtboy]

They obviously were not the only "key' swing voters, or the vote wouldn't have been so close

That make no sense. Again. Swing votes only have to be sufficient to make up a difference between a loss and a victory to be signficant. The fact that Bush did NOT win Ohio by a wide margin shows they played a key role in the victory.

It is tiresome having to explain the obvious to the oblivious.

[ShawTaylor]

"That make no sense. Again"

it does.

"Swing votes only have to be sufficient to make up a difference between a loss and a victory to be signficant"

Swing voters by definition are neither hard core conservative nor hard core liberal. Swing voters does not equal strongly pro-life voters. Swing voters come in all shades. You haven't made any sense so far. Merely the latest in your no-sense making screeches. So what's new?